Dan Fu

1.1k citations
67 papers · 650 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Fu

61 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers

Dan Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Ophthalmology 146
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 210
  • Organic Chemistry 163
  • Epidemiology 173
  • Toxicology 15
Replace J. Senior with:
J. Senior United Kingdom
Jarmo K. Laihia Finland
Matthew S. Cowlen United States
Roberto González-Salinas Mexico
J. de Vries Netherlands
Soyoung Ryu United States
Yueping Ren China
Allan J. Flach United States
Y. Kajita Japan
Alexander Birk United States
Dan Fu relative to J. Senior United Kingdom J. Senior's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×
J. Senior · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Fu. The network helps show where Dan Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Fu Line = papers co-authored together Dan Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201055
2 201142
3 201038
4 202038
5 201337
6 201433
7 201129
8 202124
9 202021
10 201519
11 202117
12 202017
13 201917
14 202016
15 202015
16 202215
17 202214
18 202112
19
[To investigate pathogen of hand, foot and mouth disease in Shenzhen in 2008].
200912
20 202111

About Dan Fu

Dan Fu is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 67 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (26 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (18 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (11 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (6 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (5 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers) and RNA regulation and disease (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (146 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (210 citations), Organic Chemistry (163 citations), Epidemiology (173 citations) and Toxicology (15 citations). Dan Fu has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Xingtao Zhou, Rui Wang, Xianxing Jiang, Gen Zhang, Yiming Cao, Xuan Ding, Fangfang Shen, Miaojun Lai, Xiaomei Shi and Wenhua Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Ophthalmology, Neuro-Oncology, Chemical Communications, Annals of Translational Medicine and Frontiers in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact