Dan Ehrlich

927 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 668 citations indexed

About

Dan Ehrlich is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Dan Ehrlich has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 668 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 1 paper in Molecular Biology and 1 paper in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Dan Ehrlich's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers) and Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (1 paper). Dan Ehrlich is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers) and Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (1 paper). Dan Ehrlich collaborates with scholars based in United States. Dan Ehrlich's co-authors include J. Orbach, Helen A. Heath, Lance B. Koutny, Oscar Salas‐Solano, Dieter Schmalzing, Aram Adourian, Paul Matsudaira and Petros T. Boufounos and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of the Franklin Institute and Perceptual and Motor Skills.

In The Last Decade

Dan Ehrlich

6 papers receiving 620 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Activation and Behavior

1963 378 citations Dan Ehrlich Archives of General Psychiatry profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dan Ehrlich United States	6	322	146	139	73	57	6	668
James Eric Eich Canada	5	466 1.4×	106 0.7×	125 0.9×	16 0.2×	124 2.2×	7	604
A.C. Mundy‐Castle South Africa	14	474 1.5×	78 0.5×	96 0.7×	19 0.3×	35 0.6×	23	749
Timo Järvilehto Finland	18	684 2.1×	116 0.8×	215 1.5×	42 0.6×	99 1.7×	33	958
Sonia Ancoli United States	7	339 1.1×	297 2.0×	284 2.0×	16 0.2×	40 0.7×	9	789
Helen C. Beh Australia	14	380 1.2×	143 1.0×	213 1.5×	15 0.2×	57 1.0×	35	639
Tim R.H. Cutmore Australia	12	296 0.9×	154 1.1×	214 1.5×	17 0.2×	48 0.8×	25	662
Katuo Yamazaki Japan	12	404 1.3×	74 0.5×	152 1.1×	19 0.3×	55 1.0×	41	525
Beverly Marshall‐Goodell United States	10	178 0.6×	115 0.8×	69 0.5×	8 0.1×	40 0.7×	19	410
Olav Krigolson Canada	19	1.1k 3.3×	209 1.4×	179 1.3×	58 0.8×	121 2.1×	40	1.3k
Henry C. Morlock United States	10	379 1.2×	40 0.3×	118 0.8×	13 0.2×	33 0.6×	14	538

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Ehrlich

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Ehrlich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Ehrlich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Ehrlich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Ehrlich

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Ehrlich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Ehrlich. The network helps show where Dan Ehrlich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Ehrlich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Ehrlich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Ehrlich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Ehrlich. Dan Ehrlich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Boufounos, Petros T., et al.. (2004). Basecalling using hidden Markov models. Journal of the Franklin Institute. 341(1-2). 23–36. 13 indexed citations

2.

Salas‐Solano, Oscar, Dieter Schmalzing, Lance B. Koutny, et al.. (2000). Optimization of High-Performance DNA Sequencing on Short Microfabricated Electrophoretic Devices. Analytical Chemistry. 72(14). 3129–3137. 61 indexed citations

3.

Ehrlich, Dan. (1963). Activation and Behavior. Archives of General Psychiatry. 8(2). 211–211. 378 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Heath, Helen A., Dan Ehrlich, & J. Orbach. (1963). Reversibility of the Necker Cube: II. Effects of Various Activating Conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 17(2). 539–546. 17 indexed citations

5.

Orbach, J., et al.. (1963). Reversibility of the Necker Cube: III. Effects of Interpolation on Reversal Rate of the Cube Presented Repetitively. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 17(2). 571–582. 26 indexed citations

6.

Orbach, J., Dan Ehrlich, & Helen A. Heath. (1963). Reversibility of the Necker Cube: I. An Examination of the Concept of “Satiation of Orientation”. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 17(2). 439–458. 173 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact