Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey★
2008914 citationsChris Lintott, Kevin Schawinski et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900 000 galaxies★
2010462 citationsChris Lintott, Kevin Schawinski et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of morphology and colour on environment
2009373 citationsS. P. Bamford, R. C. Nichol et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Andreescu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Andreescu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Andreescu more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Andreescu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Andreescu. The network helps show where Dan Andreescu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Andreescu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Andreescu.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Andreescu based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Andreescu. Dan Andreescu is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Masters, Karen L., Moein Mosleh, A. K. Romer, et al.. (2010). Galaxy Zoo: passive red spirals. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.175 indexed citations
6.
Lintott, Chris, Kevin Schawinski, S. P. Bamford, et al.. (2010). Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900 000 galaxies★. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 410(1). 166–178.462 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Schawinski, Kevin, D. Thomas, M. Sarzi, et al.. (2009). Galaxy Zoo: Blue Early-type Galaxies. AAS. 213.1 indexed citations
8.
Lintott, Chris, Kevin Schawinski, William C. Keel, et al.. (2009). Galaxy Zoo: ‘Hanny's Voorwerp’, a quasar light echo?. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 399(1). 129–140.172 indexed citations
Bamford, S. P., R. C. Nichol, I. K. Baldry, et al.. (2009). Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of morphology and colour on environment. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 393(4). 1324–1352.373 indexed citations breakdown →
Lintott, Chris, Kevin Schawinski, Anže Slosar, et al.. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey★. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 389(3). 1179–1189.914 indexed citations breakdown →
Lintott, Chris, Kevin Schawinski, D. Thomas, et al.. (2007). Galaxy Zoo: An Experiment in Public Science Participation. AAS. 211.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.