Da-Ming Wei

5.5k total citations
96 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Da-Ming Wei is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Da-Ming Wei has authored 96 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 89 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 35 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 9 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in Da-Ming Wei's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (84 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (59 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (28 papers). Da-Ming Wei is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (84 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (59 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (28 papers). Da-Ming Wei collaborates with scholars based in China, United States and Italy. Da-Ming Wei's co-authors include Yi-Zhong Fan, Zhi-Ping Jin, Y. Z. Fan, Xiang Li, Tsvi Piran, S. Covino, Tao Wang, Shao-Peng Tang, B. Zhou and Wei-Hong Gao and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, The Astrophysical Journal and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.

In The Last Decade

Da-Ming Wei

86 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Da-Ming Wei China 20 1.3k 538 66 50 42 96 1.4k
Pawan Kumar United States 22 1.6k 1.2× 499 0.9× 70 1.1× 41 0.8× 45 1.1× 52 1.7k
Paz Beniamini United States 28 1.8k 1.3× 564 1.0× 58 0.9× 38 0.8× 66 1.6× 81 1.8k
D. Frederiks Russia 16 979 0.7× 322 0.6× 110 1.7× 20 0.4× 49 1.2× 90 1.0k
Wen‐fai Fong United States 26 2.1k 1.6× 657 1.2× 45 0.7× 24 0.5× 99 2.4× 61 2.2k
U. Haud Estonia 11 1.3k 1.0× 432 0.8× 49 0.7× 15 0.3× 99 2.4× 26 1.4k
Ben Margalit United States 21 1.5k 1.1× 422 0.8× 126 1.9× 53 1.1× 21 0.5× 36 1.6k
E. Troja United States 25 1.8k 1.3× 590 1.1× 52 0.8× 19 0.4× 67 1.6× 95 1.8k
K. Wiersema United Kingdom 24 2.0k 1.5× 549 1.0× 56 0.8× 13 0.3× 153 3.6× 133 2.0k
Tejaswi Venumadhav United States 18 1.3k 1.0× 319 0.6× 188 2.8× 133 2.7× 15 0.4× 36 1.4k
Г. С. Бисноватый-Коган Russia 13 703 0.5× 254 0.5× 96 1.5× 24 0.5× 10 0.2× 93 753

Countries citing papers authored by Da-Ming Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Da-Ming Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Da-Ming Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Da-Ming Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Da-Ming Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Da-Ming Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Da-Ming Wei. The network helps show where Da-Ming Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Da-Ming Wei

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Da-Ming Wei. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Da-Ming Wei based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Da-Ming Wei. Da-Ming Wei is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wang, Yun, Yi-Han Iris Yin, Y. F. Liang, et al.. (2025). RapidGBM: An Efficient Tool for Fermi-GBM Visibility Checking and Data Analysis with a Case Study of EP240617a. The Astrophysical Journal. 993(1). 51–51.
2.
Liao, Neng-Hui, et al.. (2025). Leptohadronic Multimessenger Modeling of Two High-redshift (z > 1) Neutrino Emission Blazar Candidates. The Astrophysical Journal. 986(1). 110–110. 1 indexed citations
3.
Li, Xiangdong, et al.. (2025). LGRBs Born in Ultra-compact Binary System: Companion’s Long-term Tidal Force and Periodicity in GRB Afterglows. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics. 25(6). 65001–65001. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wang, Yun, Yu-Jia Wei, Da-Ming Wei, et al.. (2025). Probable evidence for a transient mega-electron volt emission line in the GRB 221023A. Nature Communications. 16(1). 2668–2668. 1 indexed citations
5.
Li, Long, et al.. (2024). Gravitational-wave Radiation from the Magnetar-driven Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal. 967(2). 160–160.
6.
Luo, C. N., et al.. (2024). Bulk Properties of PSR J0030+0451 Inferred with the Compactness Measurement of NICER. The Astrophysical Journal. 966(1). 98–98. 4 indexed citations
7.
Lei, Lei, Lei Zu, Guan-Wen Yuan, et al.. (2024). Black holes as the source of dark energy: A stringent test with high-redshift JWST AGNs. Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy. 67(2). 13 indexed citations
8.
Zhu, Yiming, Yun Wang, V. Lipunov, et al.. (2023). A two-component jet model for the optical plateau in the afterglow of GRB 191221B. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527(2). 1638–1647. 1 indexed citations
9.
Tang, Shao-Peng, Bo Gao, Yin-Jie Li, Yi-Zhong Fan, & Da-Ming Wei. (2023). Measuring Mass and Radius of the Maximum-mass Nonrotating Neutron Star. The Astrophysical Journal. 960(1). 67–67. 4 indexed citations
10.
Li, Xinyu, Hao-Ning He, & Da-Ming Wei. (2022). On the Jet Structures of GRB 050820A and GRB 070125. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics. 22(8). 85021–85021. 1 indexed citations
11.
Wang, Yun, et al.. (2022). Outliers in the Ep,z relation of Fermi-GBM long-duration gamma-ray bursts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 518(4). 6243–6252. 2 indexed citations
12.
Wei, Da-Ming, et al.. (2022). Identifying gravitational wave emission signature in electromagnetic observations of short gamma-ray bursts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 513(1). 1365–1371. 2 indexed citations
13.
Wei, Da-Ming, et al.. (2022). Constraining the Ellipticity of the Newborn Magnetar with the Observational Data of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts. The Astrophysical Journal. 934(2). 125–125. 7 indexed citations
14.
Tang, Shao-Peng, et al.. (2021). Constraints on phase transition and nuclear symmetry parameters with PSR J0740+6620 and multimessenger data of other neutron stars. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
15.
Li, Yin-Jie, Shao-Peng Tang, Yuan-Zhu Wang, et al.. (2021). Population Properties of Neutron Stars in the Coalescing Compact Binaries. The Astrophysical Journal. 923(1). 97–97. 9 indexed citations
16.
He, Hao-Ning, Alexander Kusenko, Shigehiro Nagataki, Yi-Zhong Fan, & Da-Ming Wei. (2018). Neutrinos from Choked Jets Accompanied by Type-II Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal. 856(2). 119–119. 42 indexed citations
17.
Jin, Zhi-Ping, Xiang Li, Yuan-Zhu Wang, et al.. (2017). Short GRBs with small opening angles: implications on local neutron star merger rate and GRB/GW association. arXiv (Cornell University).
18.
Zhang, Shuai, et al.. (2015). The long-lasting optical afterglow plateau of short burst GRB 130912A. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 2 indexed citations
19.
Yang, Bin, Zhi-Ping Jin, Xiang Li, et al.. (2015). A possible macronova in the late afterglow of the long–short burst GRB 060614. Nature Communications. 6(1). 7323–7323. 168 indexed citations
20.
Jin, Zhi-Ping, Ting Yan, Yi-Zhong Fan, & Da-Ming Wei. (2006). The flat X-ray segment of GRB051221A: two component jet in short gamma-ray bursts. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026