Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Comparison of Ustekinumab and Etanercept for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis
2010644 citationsCynthia Guzzo, B. Zhou et al.profile →
Guselkumab in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis (DISCOVER-2): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Zhou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Zhou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Zhou more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Zhou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Zhou. The network helps show where B. Zhou may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Zhou
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Zhou.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Zhou based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Zhou. B. Zhou is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Xiang, Henggao, Yang Chen, Zhixiang Qi, et al.. (2023). Mechanical behavior of TiAl alloys. Science China Technological Sciences. 66(9). 2457–2480.20 indexed citations
Nisa, M. U., J. F. Beacom, Annika H. G. Peter, et al.. (2019). The Sun at GeV-TeV Energies: A New Laboratory for Astroparticle Physics. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 51(3). 194.4 indexed citations
12.
Wang, Jinhong, L. Guan, J. Chapman, B. Zhou, & J. Zhu. (2017). A Programmable Delay Design for the sTGC Detector at the Upgraded New Small Wheel of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
13.
Guan, L., et al.. (2015). Trigger Data Serializer ASIC chip for the ATLAS New Small Wheel sTGC Detector. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2015.3 indexed citations
14.
Li, Zongzhi, et al.. (2014). New Methodology for Intersection Signal Timing Optimization to Simultaneously Minimize Vehicle and Pedestrian Delays | Article Information | J-GLOBAL. 140(5). 1–4014009.13 indexed citations
15.
Zhou, B., Yun-Feng Liang, Xiaoyuan Huang, et al.. (2014). GeV excess in the Milky Way: Depending on Diffuse Galactic gamma ray Emission template?. arXiv (Cornell University).10 indexed citations
Li, Jian‐Bin, Yanping Sheng, Zongshi Li, & B. Zhou. (2010). A Disaggregated Approach for the Computation of Network-Level Highway User Costs. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. 3(1).1 indexed citations
18.
Matson, R., et al.. (2008). Comets C/2007 Y8, 2007 Y9, 2007 Y10, 2008 A3 (soho).2 indexed citations
Gómez‐Reino, Juan J., D Halter, Kurt de Vlam, et al.. (2007). Treatment with infliximab is associated with "Major clinical response" in psoriatic arthritis patients treated with infliximab: Analysis of two double-blind placebo controlled trials.. Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.