Damien J. Mannion
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Colin W. G. CliffordJ. S. McDonaldErin GoddardSamuel G. SolomonThomas J. WhitfordDaniel KerstenCheryl A. OlmanBradley N. Jack
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (18 papers)Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Damien J. Mannion
23 papers receiving 376 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Cognitive Neuroscience 363
- Social Psychology 53
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 41
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 40
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 37
Countries citing papers authored by Damien J. Mannion
This map shows the geographic impact of Damien J. Mannion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Damien J. Mannion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Damien J. Mannion more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Damien J. Mannion
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Damien J. Mannion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Damien J. Mannion. The network helps show where Damien J. Mannion may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Damien J. Mannion
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Damien J. Mannion. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Damien J. Mannion based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Damien J. Mannion. Damien J. Mannion is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 54 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 71 | |
| 20 | 49 |
About Damien J. Mannion
Damien J. Mannion is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Biophysics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (18 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (363 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (40 citations) and Social Psychology (53 citations). Damien J. Mannion has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Colin W. G. Clifford, J. S. McDonald, Erin Goddard, Samuel G. Solomon, Thomas J. Whitford, Daniel Kersten, Cheryl A. Olman, Bradley N. Jack, A. W. Harrison and Gethin Hughes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Journal of Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.