Bradley N. Jack

908 total citations
31 papers, 413 citations indexed

About

Bradley N. Jack is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Bradley N. Jack has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 413 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Bradley N. Jack's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers). Bradley N. Jack is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers). Bradley N. Jack collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Bradley N. Jack's co-authors include Thomas J. Whitford, Oren Griffiths, Mike E. Le Pelley, David Luque, Anthony Harris, Kevin Spencer, Daniel Pearson, Andrea Polari, Suzie Lavoie and Robert P. O’Shea and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Psychological Bulletin and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Bradley N. Jack

30 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bradley N. Jack Australia 12 314 114 94 92 71 31 413
Emily A. Boeke United States 10 244 0.8× 83 0.7× 136 1.4× 85 0.9× 27 0.4× 13 372
Liv E. Falkenberg Norway 10 296 0.9× 125 1.1× 100 1.1× 31 0.3× 20 0.3× 10 433
Jonathan Del-Monte France 8 170 0.5× 124 1.1× 54 0.6× 150 1.6× 59 0.8× 10 307
Veronika Dobler United Kingdom 11 435 1.4× 172 1.5× 70 0.7× 38 0.4× 52 0.7× 14 546
Lindsey G. McIntosh United Kingdom 7 191 0.6× 156 1.4× 102 1.1× 94 1.0× 89 1.3× 12 414
Jean‐Rémy Martin France 9 187 0.6× 47 0.4× 70 0.7× 56 0.6× 57 0.8× 19 273
Maria Steffens Germany 10 226 0.7× 219 1.9× 136 1.4× 17 0.2× 71 1.0× 15 413
Daniel Joyce United Kingdom 8 251 0.8× 117 1.0× 38 0.4× 66 0.7× 39 0.5× 10 344
Pardis Poorzand United States 7 305 1.0× 183 1.6× 66 0.7× 85 0.9× 26 0.4× 9 424
Karen S. Y. Hung China 12 163 0.5× 205 1.8× 96 1.0× 22 0.2× 66 0.9× 20 356

Countries citing papers authored by Bradley N. Jack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bradley N. Jack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bradley N. Jack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bradley N. Jack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bradley N. Jack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bradley N. Jack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bradley N. Jack. The network helps show where Bradley N. Jack may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bradley N. Jack

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bradley N. Jack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bradley N. Jack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bradley N. Jack. Bradley N. Jack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Whitford, Thomas J., et al.. (2025). Do Corollary Discharges Contain Information About the Volume of Inner Speech? An ERP Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 37(9). 1521–1534. 1 indexed citations
2.
Whitford, Thomas J., Kevin Spencer, Yoji Hirano, et al.. (2025). Gamma and Theta/Alpha-Band Oscillations in the Electroencephalogram Distinguish the Content of Inner Speech. eNeuro. 12(2). ENEURO.0297–24.2025. 1 indexed citations
3.
Jack, Bradley N., et al.. (2024). No electrophysiological evidence for semantic processing during inattentional blindness. NeuroImage. 299. 120799–120799.
4.
Griffiths, Oren, Bradley N. Jack, Daniel Pearson, et al.. (2022). Disrupted auditory N1, theta power and coherence suppression to willed speech in people with schizophrenia. NeuroImage Clinical. 37. 103290–103290. 3 indexed citations
5.
Harrison, A. W., Damien J. Mannion, Bradley N. Jack, et al.. (2021). Sensory attenuation is modulated by the contrasting effects of predictability and control. NeuroImage. 237. 118103–118103. 26 indexed citations
7.
Jack, Bradley N., et al.. (2021). Sensory attenuation in the absence of movement: Differentiating motor action from sense of agency. Cortex. 141. 436–448. 11 indexed citations
8.
Jack, Bradley N., et al.. (2021). Movement Planning Determines Sensory Suppression: An Event-related Potential Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 33(12). 2427–2439. 8 indexed citations
9.
Pammer, Kristen, et al.. (2020). Pre-stimulus alpha predicts inattentional blindness. Consciousness and Cognition. 87. 103034–103034. 14 indexed citations
10.
Nelson, Barnaby, Suzie Lavoie, Łukasz Gawęda, et al.. (2019). The neurophenomenology of early psychosis: An integrative empirical study. Consciousness and Cognition. 77. 102845–102845. 65 indexed citations
11.
Jack, Bradley N., Andrea Polari, Ayaka Ando, et al.. (2019). Frontal slow wave resting EEG power is higher in individuals at Ultra High Risk for psychosis than in healthy controls but is not associated with negative symptoms or functioning. Schizophrenia Research. 208. 293–299. 6 indexed citations
12.
Jack, Bradley N., et al.. (2019). Inner speech is accompanied by a temporally-precise and content-specific corollary discharge. NeuroImage. 198. 170–180. 30 indexed citations
13.
Jack, Bradley N., Mike E. Le Pelley, Oren Griffiths, David Luque, & Thomas J. Whitford. (2018). Semantic prediction-errors are context-dependent: An ERP study. Brain Research. 1706. 86–92. 4 indexed citations
14.
Luque, David, Tom Beesley, Richard W. Morris, et al.. (2017). Goal-Directed and Habit-Like Modulations of Stimulus Processing during Reinforcement Learning. Journal of Neuroscience. 37(11). 3009–3017. 36 indexed citations
15.
Jack, Bradley N., Urte Roeber, & Robert P. O’Shea. (2017). Do early neural correlates of visual consciousness show the oblique effect? A binocular rivalry and event-related potential study. PLoS ONE. 12(12). e0188979–e0188979. 2 indexed citations
16.
Lavoie, Suzie, Bradley N. Jack, Oren Griffiths, et al.. (2017). Impaired mismatch negativity to frequency deviants in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and preliminary evidence for further impairment with transition to psychosis. Schizophrenia Research. 191. 95–100. 28 indexed citations
17.
Griffiths, Oren, Mike E. Le Pelley, Bradley N. Jack, David Luque, & Thomas J. Whitford. (2016). Cross‐modal symbolic processing can elicit either an N2 or a protracted N2/N400 response. Psychophysiology. 53(7). 1044–1053. 3 indexed citations
18.
Jack, Bradley N., Robert P. O’Shea, David Cottrell, & Walter Ritter. (2013). Does the ventriloquist illusion assist selective listening?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 39(5). 1496–1502. 5 indexed citations
19.
Jack, Bradley N.. (2012). Binocular Rivalry for Beginners. i-Perception. 3(8). 503–504. 1 indexed citations
20.
Jack, Bradley N., et al.. (2009). Rehabilitation challenges in multiple sclerosis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026