Damiano Spina
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Information Systems top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Co-authors
- Arkaitz ZubiagaMark SandersonEnrique AmigóJulio GonzaloJohanne R. TrippasLawrence CavedonRaquel MartínezVíctor Fresno
- Topics
- Topic Modeling (21 papers)Misinformation and Its Impacts (14 papers)Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Damiano Spina
60 papers receiving 752 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Artificial Intelligence 535
- Information Systems 302
- Sociology and Political Science 205
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 118
- Communication 84
Countries citing papers authored by Damiano Spina
This map shows the geographic impact of Damiano Spina's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Damiano Spina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Damiano Spina more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Damiano Spina
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Damiano Spina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Damiano Spina. The network helps show where Damiano Spina may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Damiano Spina
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Damiano Spina. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Damiano Spina based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Damiano Spina. Damiano Spina is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | Building a Benchmark for Task Progress in Digital Assistants | 2 |
| 19 | Understanding user behavior in job and talent search: an initial investigation | 10 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Damiano Spina
Damiano Spina is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Information Systems and Management and Information Systems, having authored 65 papers that have together received 802 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topic Modeling (21 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (14 papers) and Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (535 citations), Information Systems (302 citations) and Communication (84 citations). Damiano Spina has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Arkaitz Zubiaga, Mark Sanderson, Enrique Amigó, Julio Gonzalo, Johanne R. Trippas, Lawrence Cavedon, Raquel Martínez, Víctor Fresno, Gianluca Demartini and Stefano Mizzaro. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Communications of the ACM and Expert Systems with Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.