Dakota Howard
About
In The Last Decade
Dakota Howard
6 papers receiving 100 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Infectious Diseases 66
- Epidemiology 54
- Molecular Biology 17
- Ecology 16
- Food Science 12
Countries citing papers authored by Dakota Howard
This map shows the geographic impact of Dakota Howard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dakota Howard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dakota Howard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dakota Howard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dakota Howard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dakota Howard. The network helps show where Dakota Howard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dakota Howard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dakota Howard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dakota Howard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dakota Howard. Dakota Howard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 69 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | Intersections of Soundscapes and Conservation: Ecologies of Sound in Naturecultures | 7 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.