Dagmar Knebel
About
In The Last Decade
Dagmar Knebel
12 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Molecular Biology 178
- Immunology 132
- Epidemiology 65
- Genetics 64
- Hepatology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Dagmar Knebel
This map shows the geographic impact of Dagmar Knebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dagmar Knebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dagmar Knebel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dagmar Knebel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dagmar Knebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dagmar Knebel. The network helps show where Dagmar Knebel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dagmar Knebel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dagmar Knebel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dagmar Knebel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dagmar Knebel. Dagmar Knebel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 66 | |
| 4 | 80 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | Site-specific promoter methylations and gene inactivation. | 10 |
| 12 | 43 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.