D. Vinatier

3.9k total citations
172 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

D. Vinatier is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery and Reproductive Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, D. Vinatier has authored 172 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 39 papers in Surgery and 32 papers in Reproductive Medicine. Recurrent topics in D. Vinatier's work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (17 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (16 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (15 papers). D. Vinatier is often cited by papers focused on Uterine Myomas and Treatments (17 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (16 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (15 papers). D. Vinatier collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. D. Vinatier's co-authors include P Dufour, Pierre Collinet, Michel Cosson, Michel Salzet, Isabelle Fournier, Jean-Marie Monnier, Daniele Vergara, Benjamin Merlot, Robert Day and F Puech and has published in prestigious journals such as Blood, Scientific Reports and Human Reproduction Update.

In The Last Decade

D. Vinatier

160 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

D. Vinatier
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 743
  • Reproductive Medicine 684
  • Molecular Biology 673
  • Surgery 475
  • Immunology 458
Replace Sadaf Ghaem‐Maghami with:
Sadaf Ghaem‐Maghami United Kingdom
Terence J. Colgan Canada
Luı́s Otávio Sarian Brazil
George D. Wilbanks United States
Angel Chao Taiwan
Lars‐Christian Horn Germany
Sophie Derchain Brazil
S Chim Hong Kong
Michael Rodriguez United States
Rosmarie Caduff Switzerland
Sadaf Ghaem‐Maghami United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to D. Vinatier
D. Vinatier · 1×
Citations per year, relative to D. Vinatier
D. Vinatier · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by D. Vinatier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Vinatier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Vinatier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Vinatier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Vinatier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Vinatier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Vinatier. The network helps show where D. Vinatier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Vinatier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Vinatier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Vinatier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Vinatier. D. Vinatier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 4
3 27
4 50
5 7
6 1
7 16
8 144
9 40
10 30
11
Bulletin de synthèse de veille 2005. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique : Mise à jour 2005 des recommandations pour la prise en charge des patients adultes atteints d’un mélanome cutané sans métastase à distance (Rapport abrégé)
5
12 74
13 1
14 8
15 78
16 113
17 10
18 2
19 84
20 15

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026