D. Scholefield

4.2k total citations
118 papers, 3.4k citations indexed

About

D. Scholefield is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Soil Science and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, D. Scholefield has authored 118 papers receiving a total of 3.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 43 papers in Soil Science and 23 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in D. Scholefield's work include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (51 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (38 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (20 papers). D. Scholefield is often cited by papers focused on Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (51 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (38 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (20 papers). D. Scholefield collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and United States. D. Scholefield's co-authors include J. M. B. Hawkins, K. Tyson, A. del Prado, T. H. Misselbrook, L. M. Cardenas, A. C. Stone, D. R. Lockyer, David R. Chadwick, Les Ebdon and Jim Braven and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Analytical Chemistry and The Science of The Total Environment.

In The Last Decade

D. Scholefield

109 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. Scholefield United Kingdom 36 1.5k 1.5k 824 678 474 118 3.4k
Catherine J. Watson United Kingdom 34 1.7k 1.1× 2.2k 1.5× 853 1.0× 408 0.6× 713 1.5× 81 3.3k
Larry G. Bundy United States 36 1.6k 1.1× 2.3k 1.5× 518 0.6× 999 1.5× 1.1k 2.2× 77 3.8k
M. B. David United States 19 1.3k 0.9× 1.4k 0.9× 552 0.7× 563 0.8× 828 1.7× 30 3.1k
C. P. Webster United Kingdom 23 1.1k 0.7× 1.3k 0.8× 595 0.7× 241 0.4× 431 0.9× 61 2.4k
George E. Rayment Australia 12 897 0.6× 1.5k 1.0× 574 0.7× 340 0.5× 925 2.0× 44 3.7k
Vimala D. Nair United States 39 1.4k 0.9× 2.0k 1.3× 613 0.7× 447 0.7× 472 1.0× 89 4.5k
Bernard Nicolardot France 28 1.2k 0.8× 2.8k 1.8× 1.0k 1.3× 644 0.9× 1.3k 2.8× 78 4.2k
N. B. Comerford United States 40 979 0.6× 2.1k 1.4× 820 1.0× 285 0.4× 1.1k 2.2× 134 4.5k
N. Millar United States 19 993 0.7× 1.8k 1.2× 770 0.9× 620 0.9× 655 1.4× 159 2.9k
Pierre-André Jacinthe United States 37 1.3k 0.8× 2.2k 1.4× 1.2k 1.4× 743 1.1× 1.4k 2.9× 92 5.0k

Countries citing papers authored by D. Scholefield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Scholefield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Scholefield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Scholefield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Scholefield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Scholefield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Scholefield. The network helps show where D. Scholefield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Scholefield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Scholefield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Scholefield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Scholefield. D. Scholefield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Prado, A. del & D. Scholefield. (2006). Use of SIMS Dairy modelling framework system to specify sustainable UK diary farms. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 6 indexed citations
2.
Scholefield, D.. (2003). Some impacts of crop quality on environment and biodiversity. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 1 indexed citations
3.
Prado, A. del, Lawrence H. Brown, & D. Scholefield. (2003). NGAUGE DSS as a tool to assist UK dairy farmers to comply with EU nitrate legislation. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 1 indexed citations
4.
Scholefield, D., et al.. (2003). An investigation of nitrogen flows on dairy farms with an extended grazing management system. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 1 indexed citations
5.
Haygarth, P. M., D. Scholefield, & S. C. Jarvis. (2003). Nutrients in rivers. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 1 indexed citations
6.
Molle, G., et al.. (2002). Low input animal production based on forage legumes for grazing systems. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 1 indexed citations
7.
Scholefield, D., et al.. (2002). Assessment of nitrate leaching from beneath forage legumes. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)). 6 indexed citations
8.
Halling, Magnus & D. Scholefield. (2001). Correlation between yield of forage legumes in grass mixtures and accumulation of soil mineral nitrogen in Sweden. UKnowledge (University of Kentucky). 1 indexed citations
9.
McTiernan, Kevin B., S. C. Jarvis, D. Scholefield, & M. H. B. Hayes. (2001). Dissolved organic carbon losses from grazed grasslands. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 2 indexed citations
10.
Scholefield, D., et al.. (2000). Nutrient cycling in grazing systems. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 3 indexed citations
11.
Hawkins, J. M. B. & D. Scholefield. (2000). Leaching of dissolved organic N from grass - white clover pasture in SW England. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 5 indexed citations
12.
Brown, Lawrence H., et al.. (2000). A decision support system to optimise N use in grassland for economic and environmental targets. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 1 indexed citations
13.
Brown, Laurie, et al.. (1999). The effect of sulphur application on efficiency of nitrogen use in grassland: some preliminary results. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).
14.
Brown, Laurie & D. Scholefield. (1998). A model to optimize nitrogen use according to grassland management, soil conditions and weather patterns for economic and environmental targets. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 1 indexed citations
15.
Scholefield, D., et al.. (1997). Integration of soil testing and modelling as a basis for fertiliser recommendations for grassland. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 2 indexed citations
16.
Hawkins, J. M. B., P. M. Haygarth, S. C. Jarvis, & D. Scholefield. (1996). Long-term study on the transfer of phosphorus from grassland soil to surface waters. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 1 indexed citations
17.
Scholefield, D. & Jo Smith. (1996). Nitrogen flows in ley-arable systems. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 5 indexed citations
18.
Jarvis, S. C., D. Scholefield, & B. F. Pain. (1995). Nitrogen cycling in grazing systems. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 105 indexed citations
19.
Scholefield, D., et al.. (1995). Development of a rapid field test for soil mineral nitrogen and its application to grazed grassland. Soil Use and Management. 11(1). 33–43. 27 indexed citations
20.
Scholefield, D., D. R. Lockyer, & S.F. Ledgard. (1995). The simulation of N-fixation by white clover within a model describing N-flows in grazed grassland. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026