D. Peach

1.9k total citations
8 papers, 37 citations indexed

About

D. Peach is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, D. Peach has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 37 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in D. Peach's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (2 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers). D. Peach is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (2 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers). D. Peach collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Italy. D. Peach's co-authors include F. Gasparini, G. Bencze, G. Wrochna, E. Radermacher, C. Seez, Michel Della Negra, G. Walzel, P. Sartori, P. Zotto and C.-E. Wulz and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, The British Journal of Social Work and Pastoral Care in Education.

In The Last Decade

D. Peach

7 papers receiving 33 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
D. Peach United Kingdom	4	21	6	5	5	5	8	37
J. H. Williams United States	4	21 1.0×	8 1.3×	6 1.2×	7 1.4×	4 0.8×	8	39
S. Leone Italy	3	11 0.5×	2 0.3×	3 0.6×	2 0.4×	3 0.6×	15	26
M. Cruz Torres United States	3	17 0.8×	3 0.5×	2 0.4×	1 0.2×	2 0.4×	4	26
A. Mazzacane United States	3	19 0.9×		4 0.8×	6 1.2×	2 0.4×	11	28
D. R. Grant Canada	4	12 0.6×	9 1.5×	5 1.0×			8	35
Andy Nelson United States	3	17 0.8×	4 0.7×	2 0.4×			5	38
Asia Parker United States	3	6 0.3×	4 0.7×	10 2.0×	2 0.4×		4	21
P. Madigan United States	2	15 0.7×		2 0.4×	13 2.6×	5 1.0×	3	35
A. Ranieri United Kingdom	3	29 1.4×	2 0.3×	8 1.6×	8 1.6×	19 3.8×	4	45
D. Gamba Italy	4	24 1.1×	3 0.5×			7 1.4×	6	34

Countries citing papers authored by D. Peach

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Peach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Peach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Peach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Peach

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Peach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Peach. The network helps show where D. Peach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Peach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Peach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Peach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Peach. D. Peach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

McAndrew, Sue, et al.. (2023). The lived experiences of pastoral staff employed in social, emotional, and mental health (SEMH) secondary schools: a narrative exploration. Pastoral Care in Education. 43(1). 47–66. 1 indexed citations

2.

Peach, D., et al.. (2019). Moving Towards Self-actualization: A Trauma-Informed and Needs-Focused Approach to the Mental Health Needs of Survivors of Commercial Child Sexual Exploitation. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford). 6(2). 27–27. 4 indexed citations

3.

Rowland, Andrew, et al.. (2018). Outcomes from the Children and Young People’s Advocacy House Consultation Event – MediaCityUK. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford). 1 indexed citations

4.

Peach, D., et al.. (2018). Not just a thought : a communication model - learning with children, young people and young adults about how we can keep them safe. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford). 1 indexed citations

5.

Peach, D., et al.. (2015). Needs Analysis Report following the Sexual Exploitation of Children in Rotherham. 1 indexed citations

6.

Peach, D.. (2015). Practical Social Work Ethics: Complex Dilemmas within Applied Social Care. The British Journal of Social Work. 45(2). 764–765. 5 indexed citations

7.

Gasparini, F., I. Lippi, R. Martinelli, et al.. (1994). Performance of a DTBX prototype. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 344(1). 137–142. 3 indexed citations

8.

Gasparini, F., R. Martinelli, Anna Teresa Meneguzzo, et al.. (1993). Bunch crossing identification at LHC using a mean-timer technique. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 336(1-2). 91–97. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact