D. Naik

1.1k total citations
10 papers, 743 citations indexed

About

D. Naik is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, D. Naik has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 743 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 2 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in D. Naik's work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (10 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (6 papers) and Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (5 papers). D. Naik is often cited by papers focused on Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (10 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (6 papers) and Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (5 papers). D. Naik collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Italy and France. D. Naik's co-authors include Florian Schreck, A. Trenkwalder, Rudolf Grimm, G. Hendl, Jacopo Catani, Giacomo Lamporesi, F. Minardi, Michael Gring, Adrian Kantian and Thierry Giamarchi and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and The European Physical Journal D.

In The Last Decade

D. Naik

9 papers receiving 727 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
D. Naik Austria	8	735	243	69	32	18	10	743
Wujie Huang United States	5	696 0.9×	229 0.9×	42 0.6×	25 0.8×	11 0.6×	11	716
Nathan Gemelke United States	10	786 1.1×	202 0.8×	99 1.4×	60 1.9×	59 3.3×	18	816
Guillaume Salomon Germany	11	603 0.8×	249 1.0×	84 1.2×	34 1.1×	23 1.3×	13	641
Ramesh V. Pai India	15	615 0.8×	324 1.3×	39 0.6×	24 0.8×	17 0.9×	30	639
Cheng-Hsun Wu United States	6	805 1.1×	295 1.2×	41 0.6×	18 0.6×	24 1.3×	8	820
Nathaniel Burdick United States	7	1.1k 1.5×	327 1.3×	78 1.1×	75 2.3×	40 2.2×	7	1.1k
Andrey Turlapov Russia	9	633 0.9×	202 0.8×	39 0.6×	22 0.7×	16 0.9×	13	657
B. J. DeSalvo United States	13	818 1.1×	158 0.7×	75 1.1×	37 1.2×	75 4.2×	19	833
Ákos Rapp Germany	9	395 0.5×	188 0.8×	31 0.4×	50 1.6×	7 0.4×	10	426
Sören Götze Germany	6	369 0.5×	138 0.6×	30 0.4×	13 0.4×	26 1.4×	6	383

Countries citing papers authored by D. Naik

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Naik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Naik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Naik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Naik

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Naik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Naik. The network helps show where D. Naik may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Naik

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Naik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Naik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Naik. D. Naik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Bertoldi, Andréa, et al.. (2021). Fast Control of Atom-Light Interaction in a Narrow Linewidth Cavity. Physical Review Letters. 127(1). 13202–13202. 7 indexed citations

2.

Condon, G., B. Barrett, D. Naik, et al.. (2019). All-Optical Bose-Einstein Condensates in Microgravity. Physical Review Letters. 123(24). 240402–240402. 41 indexed citations

3.

Naik, D., Tim Freegarde, F. Minardi, et al.. (2019). Velocity Tuned Hyperfine Dark State Loading and Cooling in a dipole trap. arXiv (Cornell University).

4.

Naik, D., et al.. (2018). Bose–Einstein condensate array in a malleable optical trap formed in a traveling wave cavity. Quantum Science and Technology. 3(4). 45009–45009. 14 indexed citations

5.

Catani, Jacopo, Giacomo Lamporesi, D. Naik, et al.. (2012). Quantum dynamics of impurities in a one-dimensional Bose gas. Physical Review A. 85(2). 230 indexed citations

6.

Trenkwalder, A., Christoph Kohstall, Matteo Zaccanti, et al.. (2011). Hydrodynamic Expansion of a Strongly Interacting Fermi-Fermi Mixture. Physical Review Letters. 106(11). 115304–115304. 62 indexed citations

7.

Naik, D., A. Trenkwalder, Christoph Kohstall, et al.. (2011). Feshbach resonances in the 6Li-40K Fermi-Fermi mixture: elastic versus inelastic interactions. The European Physical Journal D. 65(1-2). 55–65. 41 indexed citations

8.

Trenkwalder, A., D. Naik, G. Kerner, et al.. (2010). All-optical production of a degenerate mixture ofLi6andK40and creation of heteronuclear molecules. Physical Review A. 81(4). 48 indexed citations

9.

Trenkwalder, A., et al.. (2009). Collisional Stability ofK40Immersed in a Strongly Interacting Fermi Gas ofLi6. Physical Review Letters. 103(22). 223203–223203. 72 indexed citations

10.

Kerner, G., D. Naik, A. Trenkwalder, et al.. (2008). Exploring an Ultracold Fermi-Fermi Mixture: Interspecies Feshbach Resonances and Scattering Properties ofLi6andK40. Physical Review Letters. 100(5). 53201–53201. 228 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact