D. Mobarak

668 total citations
8 papers, 432 citations indexed

About

D. Mobarak is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Oncology and Geriatrics and Gerontology. According to data from OpenAlex, D. Mobarak has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 432 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 3 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology. Recurrent topics in D. Mobarak's work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). D. Mobarak is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). D. Mobarak collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and South Africa. D. Mobarak's co-authors include Daniel Pope, Riccardo A. Audisio, Harald J. Hoekstra, Roberto Gennari, A. Stotter, C West, G Corsini, Massimo Maffezzini, Ann Capewell and H.S.J. Ramesh and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology and European Journal of Orthodontics.

In The Last Decade

D. Mobarak

8 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. Mobarak United Kingdom 5 229 168 131 123 110 8 432
H.S.J. Ramesh United Kingdom 7 246 1.1× 203 1.2× 162 1.2× 134 1.1× 138 1.3× 14 535
Hans‐Olaf Johannessen Norway 10 294 1.3× 147 0.9× 302 2.3× 154 1.3× 186 1.7× 34 646
Itsuto Hamano Japan 15 100 0.4× 101 0.6× 274 2.1× 63 0.5× 37 0.3× 48 625
Russell Howerton United States 9 74 0.3× 200 1.2× 263 2.0× 48 0.4× 59 0.5× 24 437
Kathelijn S. Versteeg Netherlands 11 185 0.8× 310 1.8× 148 1.1× 329 2.7× 22 0.2× 21 621
Nicoleta Reinald France 8 293 1.3× 173 1.0× 62 0.5× 194 1.6× 25 0.2× 10 488
H. Wildiers Italy 2 327 1.4× 170 1.0× 75 0.6× 215 1.7× 37 0.3× 2 495
Ab A. Aaldriks Netherlands 6 302 1.3× 137 0.8× 53 0.4× 288 2.3× 23 0.2× 8 457
Shani Alston United States 8 328 1.4× 233 1.4× 64 0.5× 346 2.8× 26 0.2× 13 661
Olga T. Filippova United States 11 89 0.4× 74 0.4× 162 1.2× 63 0.5× 41 0.4× 35 333

Countries citing papers authored by D. Mobarak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Mobarak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Mobarak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Mobarak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Mobarak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Mobarak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Mobarak. The network helps show where D. Mobarak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Mobarak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Mobarak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Mobarak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Mobarak. D. Mobarak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Mobarak, D., Jayne Harrison, & Sally Spencer. (2023). How well do orthodontic RCTs comply with CONSORT guidelines?. European Journal of Orthodontics. 45(4). 438–443. 1 indexed citations
2.
Mobarak, D., et al.. (2022). A retrospective cohort study on the aetiology and characteristics of maxillofacial fractures presenting to a tertiary centre in the UK. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 77. 103622–103622. 5 indexed citations
3.
Borrelli, Mimi R., Reem Farwana, Tom W. Andrew, et al.. (2018). Assessing the Compliance of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Craniofacial Surgery Journals With the CONSORT Statement. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 30(1). 96–104. 11 indexed citations
4.
Audisio, Riccardo A., Daniel Pope, H.S.J. Ramesh, et al.. (2007). Shall we operate? Preoperative assessment in elderly cancer patients (PACE) can help. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 65(2). 156–163. 297 indexed citations
5.
Pope, Daniel, H. Ramesh, Roberto Gennari, et al.. (2006). Pre-operative assessment of cancer in the elderly (PACE): A comprehensive assessment of underlying characteristics of elderly cancer patients prior to elective surgery. Surgical Oncology. 15(4). 189–197. 110 indexed citations
6.
Audisio, Riccardo A., H.S.J. Ramesh, Roberto Gennari, et al.. (2006). Can preoperative assessment of cancer in the elderly (PACE) predict 30-days postoperative outcomes?. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 24(18_suppl). 8537–8537. 2 indexed citations
7.
Ramesh, H.S.J., A. Stotter, D. Mobarak, et al.. (2006). O8 Testing CGA components to predict 30 days surgery outcome in elderly cancer patient. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 60. S21–S21. 5 indexed citations
8.
Audisio, Riccardo A., H. Ramesh, Roberto Gennari, et al.. (2005). Preoperative assessment of cancer in the elderly (PACE): Interim analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 23(16_suppl). 8028–8028. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026