D. Michael Scantlebury
- Ecology top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Small Animals top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rory P. WilsonNikki J. MarksMark D. HoltonNigel C. BennettTorbjørn ErgonXavier LambinJohn R. SpeakmanRachel D. Cavanagh
- Topics
- Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (22 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (21 papers)Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
D. Michael Scantlebury
53 papers receiving 922 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Ecology 613
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 396
- Small Animals 159
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 144
- Ecological Modeling 85
Countries citing papers authored by D. Michael Scantlebury
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Michael Scantlebury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Michael Scantlebury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Michael Scantlebury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Michael Scantlebury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Michael Scantlebury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Michael Scantlebury. The network helps show where D. Michael Scantlebury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Michael Scantlebury
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Michael Scantlebury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Michael Scantlebury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Michael Scantlebury. D. Michael Scantlebury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 154 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 72 |
About D. Michael Scantlebury
D. Michael Scantlebury is a scholar working on Small Animals, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 54 papers that have together received 933 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (22 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (21 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (56 citations), Ecology (613 citations) and Small Animals (159 citations). D. Michael Scantlebury has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Rory P. Wilson, Nikki J. Marks, Mark D. Holton, Nigel C. Bennett, Nikki J. Marks, Torbjørn Ergon, Xavier Lambin, John R. Speakman, Rachel D. Cavanagh and Michael G. L. Mills. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.