D. Mavrelos

2.7k total citations
54 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

D. Mavrelos is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, D. Mavrelos has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 25 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 24 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in D. Mavrelos's work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (22 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (18 papers) and Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (13 papers). D. Mavrelos is often cited by papers focused on Endometriosis Research and Treatment (22 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (18 papers) and Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (13 papers). D. Mavrelos collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Slovenia. D. Mavrelos's co-authors include D. Jurkovic, W. Hoo, Tom Holland, J. Naftalin, K. Pateman, Ertan Sarıdoğan, Jure Knez, Alfred Cutner, Natalie Nunes and Jackie Ross and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Human Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

D. Mavrelos

52 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. Mavrelos United Kingdom 22 959 896 521 289 188 54 1.5k
Justin Chu United Kingdom 12 633 0.7× 391 0.4× 356 0.7× 158 0.5× 427 2.3× 22 962
J.-L. Pouly France 16 428 0.4× 319 0.4× 284 0.5× 152 0.5× 115 0.6× 68 768
José Carugno United States 21 584 0.6× 977 1.1× 235 0.5× 116 0.4× 244 1.3× 113 1.2k
R. Campo Belgium 17 716 0.7× 997 1.1× 386 0.7× 232 0.8× 93 0.5× 54 1.4k
Jan Bosteels Belgium 21 580 0.6× 1.0k 1.1× 300 0.6× 153 0.5× 201 1.1× 48 1.4k
Gregory Fossum United States 12 543 0.6× 251 0.3× 614 1.2× 333 1.2× 123 0.7× 19 1.1k
Annalisa Inversetti Italy 17 404 0.4× 483 0.5× 306 0.6× 405 1.4× 246 1.3× 49 1.0k
P. Capmas France 17 246 0.3× 440 0.5× 352 0.7× 265 0.9× 55 0.3× 101 851
Louis N. Weckstein United States 14 451 0.5× 112 0.1× 487 0.9× 308 1.1× 144 0.8× 32 854
Michelle L. Matthews United States 15 489 0.5× 428 0.5× 304 0.6× 232 0.8× 56 0.3× 39 832

Countries citing papers authored by D. Mavrelos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Mavrelos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Mavrelos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Mavrelos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Mavrelos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Mavrelos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Mavrelos. The network helps show where D. Mavrelos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Mavrelos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Mavrelos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Mavrelos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Mavrelos. D. Mavrelos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davies, Melanie, et al.. (2025). Clinical and ethical perspectives of ovarian stimulation and oocyte cryopreservation in adolescents: 6 years experience from a tertiary centre. Human Reproduction Open. 2025(1). hoaf005–hoaf005. 1 indexed citations
2.
Yasmin, Ephia, et al.. (2025). Quantitative analysis of uterine peristalsis in women with adenomyosis using optical flow for motion quantification. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 52(3). 105073–105073.
3.
Kastora, Stavroula, et al.. (2024). The effectiveness of prolonged downregulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) treatment in women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 301. 87–94. 2 indexed citations
4.
Knez, Jure, et al.. (2024). Ultrasound study of natural progression of ovarian endometrioma. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 64(3). 405–411. 5 indexed citations
5.
Kastora, Stavroula, et al.. (2024). An age-related nomogram for antral follicle count: an observational study of 3821 women. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 49(5). 104295–104295. 1 indexed citations
7.
Davies, Melanie, Jennifer Hall, Judith Stephenson, et al.. (2022). SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester and the risk of early miscarriage: a UK population-based prospective cohort study of 3041 pregnancies conceived during the pandemic. Human Reproduction. 37(6). 1126–1133. 31 indexed citations
8.
Silva, Sarah Martins da, et al.. (2022). Fertility preservation provision in the NHS: a national assessment of care policies. Human Fertility. 26(3). 433–438. 8 indexed citations
10.
Knez, Jure, et al.. (2021). Risk prediction of major haemorrhage with surgical treatment of live cesarean scar pregnancies. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 264. 224–231. 19 indexed citations
11.
Mavrelos, D., et al.. (2019). Discovery of non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Clinical Proteomics. 16(1). 14–14. 39 indexed citations
12.
Mavrelos, D., et al.. (2017). The impact of adenomyosis on the outcome of IVF–embryo transfer. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 35(5). 549–554. 58 indexed citations
13.
Mavrelos, D., et al.. (2016). Variation in antral follicle counts at different times in the menstrual cycle: does it matter?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 33(2). 174–179. 9 indexed citations
14.
Helmy, S., D. Mavrelos, E. Sawyer, et al.. (2015). Serum Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (β- hCG) Clearance Curves in Women with Successfully Expectantly Managed Tubal Ectopic Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cohort Study. PLoS ONE. 10(7). e0130598–e0130598. 10 indexed citations
15.
Moro, F., et al.. (2014). Natural history of ovarian endometrioma in pregnancy. BMC Women s Health. 14(1). 128–128. 20 indexed citations
16.
Holland, Tom, Alfred Cutner, Ertan Sarıdoğan, et al.. (2013). Ultrasound mapping of pelvic endometriosis: does the location and number of lesions affect the diagnostic accuracy? a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study. BMC Women s Health. 13(1). 43–43. 90 indexed citations
17.
Naftalin, J., W. Hoo, K. Pateman, et al.. (2012). How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic. Human Reproduction. 27(12). 3432–3439. 237 indexed citations
18.
Naftalin, J., et al.. (2011). Inter‐ and intraobserver variability in three‐dimensional ultrasound assessment of the endometrial–myometrial junction and factors affecting its visualization. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 39(5). 587–591. 34 indexed citations
19.
Hoo, W., J. Yazbek, Tom Holland, et al.. (2010). Expectant management of ultrasonically diagnosed ovarian dermoid cysts: is it possible to predict outcome?. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 36(2). 235–240. 34 indexed citations
20.
Sawyer, E., et al.. (2009). Use of serum progesterone measurements to reduce need for follow‐up in women with pregnancies of unknown location. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 33(6). 704–710. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026