D. M. Morse
- Animal Science and Zoology
- Environmental Chemistry
- Process Chemistry and Technology
- Ecology
- Agronomy and Crop Science
- Journals
- Journal of Animal Science
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
D. M. Morse
2 papers receiving 39 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Animal Science and Zoology 15
- Environmental Chemistry 13
- Process Chemistry and Technology 10
- Ecology 7
- Agronomy and Crop Science 7
Countries citing papers authored by D. M. Morse
This map shows the geographic impact of D. M. Morse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. M. Morse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. M. Morse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. M. Morse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. M. Morse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. M. Morse. The network helps show where D. M. Morse may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 38 |
About D. M. Morse
D. M. Morse is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 2 papers that have together received 49 indexed citations. The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (10 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (15 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (13 citations). D. M. Morse has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.