D. L. Prout

3.4k total citations
21 papers, 347 citations indexed

About

D. L. Prout is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, D. L. Prout has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 347 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 8 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in D. L. Prout's work include Nuclear physics research studies (19 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (8 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (8 papers). D. L. Prout is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (19 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (8 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (8 papers). D. L. Prout collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Russia. D. L. Prout's co-authors include J. Rapaport, E. Sugarbaker, B. Luther, T. N. Taddeucci, M.P. Rekalo, E. Tomasi‐Gustafsson, R. C. Byrd, D. Marchlenski, L.J. Rybarcyk and C. D. Goodman and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

D. L. Prout

20 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. L. Prout United States 11 325 149 78 42 24 21 347
M. A. Pickar United States 12 307 0.9× 144 1.0× 46 0.6× 63 1.5× 20 0.8× 27 341
A. Bobyk Poland 9 348 1.1× 91 0.6× 43 0.6× 25 0.6× 26 1.1× 20 368
S. A. Wood United States 13 290 0.9× 99 0.7× 48 0.6× 93 2.2× 11 0.5× 30 319
C. Whitten United States 8 207 0.6× 89 0.6× 44 0.6× 27 0.6× 16 0.7× 10 221
M. Žáková Germany 5 199 0.6× 192 1.3× 44 0.6× 44 1.0× 11 0.5× 6 256
T. Hennino France 11 323 1.0× 93 0.6× 44 0.6× 75 1.8× 24 1.0× 19 351
E. Stephan Poland 13 349 1.1× 208 1.4× 50 0.6× 84 2.0× 24 1.0× 61 420
S. W. Wissink United States 10 241 0.7× 102 0.7× 54 0.7× 27 0.6× 12 0.5× 30 259
F. Vogler Germany 10 361 1.1× 114 0.8× 53 0.7× 78 1.9× 19 0.8× 36 382
S. Strauch United States 10 217 0.7× 75 0.5× 38 0.5× 65 1.5× 23 1.0× 30 241

Countries citing papers authored by D. L. Prout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. L. Prout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. L. Prout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. L. Prout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. L. Prout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. L. Prout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. L. Prout. The network helps show where D. L. Prout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. L. Prout

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. L. Prout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. L. Prout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. L. Prout. D. L. Prout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chang, S., E.J. Stephenson, A.D. Bacher, et al.. (2005). Reaction mechanism for natural parity (p,p') transitions inB10. Physical Review C. 71(6). 6 indexed citations
2.
Semenov, A. Yu., R. Madey, A. Ahmidouch, et al.. (2005). Calibration of a neutron polarimeter in the 0.2–1.1 GeV region. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 557(2). 585–593. 1 indexed citations
3.
4.
Rapaport, J., X. F. Yang, D. L. Prout, et al.. (2001). Zero degree polarization transfer measurements for the13C(p→,n→)13Nreaction at 197 MeV and empirical Gamow-Teller strength distribution. Physical Review C. 63(2). 8 indexed citations
5.
Rapaport, J., K. Hicks, D. L. Prout, et al.. (2001). INPOL – the Indiana University Neutron Polarimeter. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 457(1-2). 309–331. 7 indexed citations
6.
Prout, D. L., J. Rapaport, E. Sugarbaker, et al.. (2000). Observation of the spin isovector monopole resonance using thePb(p→,n→)Bireaction at 795 MeV. Physical Review C. 63(1). 11 indexed citations
7.
Rekalo, M.P., E. Tomasi‐Gustafsson, & D. L. Prout. (1999). Search for evidence of two-photon exchange in new experimental high momentum transfer data on electron deuteron elastic scattering. Physical Review C. 60(4). 40 indexed citations
8.
Heerden, I.J. van, J. Rapaport, D. L. Prout, et al.. (1999). Zero-degree differential cross sections andDNNvalues for the17,18O(p→,n→)17,18Freactions atEp=118 MeV. Physical Review C. 59(3). 1488–1496.
9.
Rapaport, J., D. L. Prout, C.D. Goodman, et al.. (1999). Measurement of Gamow-Teller strength for127Ias a solar neutrino detector. Physical Review C. 59(1). 500–509. 16 indexed citations
10.
Watson, J. W., B. D. Anderson, A. R. Baldwin, et al.. (1996). Spin observables for the isovector spin-dipole resonance seen in. Nuclear Physics A. 599(1-2). 211–216. 2 indexed citations
11.
Rapaport, J., C. A. Whitten, Daniel E. Adams, et al.. (1994). Multipole decomposition of theO16(p,n)16F andO18(p,n)18F reactions at 494 MeV. Physical Review C. 49(6). 3104–3116. 10 indexed citations
12.
Prout, D. L., E. Sugarbaker, B. Luther, et al.. (1994). Spin-longitudinal and spin-transverse cross sections for Δ production in the reaction. Nuclear Physics A. 577(1-2). 233–236. 12 indexed citations
13.
Taddeucci, T. N., B. Luther, L.J. Rybarcyk, et al.. (1994). Momentum Dependence of the Nuclear Isovector Spin Responses from (p→,n→) Reactions at 494 MeV. Physical Review Letters. 73(26). 3516–3519. 53 indexed citations
14.
Taddeucci, T. N., L.J. Rybarcyk, D. L. Prout, et al.. (1993). Polarization transfer in (p,n) reactions at 318 and 494 MeV and the effective interaction. Physical Review Letters. 71(5). 684–687. 13 indexed citations
15.
Taddeucci, T. N., J. B. McClelland, T. A. Carey, et al.. (1993). Polarization transfer in quasifree (p→,n→ ) reactions at 495 MeV. Physical Review C. 47(5). 2159–2177. 64 indexed citations
16.
McClelland, J. B., T. N. Taddeucci, W.P. Alford, et al.. (1992). Quasifree polarization-transfer measurements in the (p→,n→) reaction at 495 MeV. Physical Review Letters. 69(4). 582–585. 53 indexed citations
17.
Peterson, R. J., S. Høibråten, J. Ouyang, et al.. (1992). Quasifree pion single charge exchange at 500 MeV. Physics Letters B. 297(3-4). 238–242. 14 indexed citations
18.
Taddeucci, T.N., R. C. Byrd, T. A. Carey, et al.. (1991). Cross section and analyzing power for quasifree (p, n) reactions. Nuclear Physics A. 527. 393–398. 6 indexed citations
19.
Taddeucci, T.N., R. C. Byrd, T. A. Carey, et al.. (1990). Gamow-Teller transition strengths from theB11(p,n)11C reaction in the energy range 160–795 MeV. Physical Review C. 42(3). 935–946. 10 indexed citations
20.
Sugarbaker, E., D. Marchlenski, T. N. Taddeucci, et al.. (1990). Isovector effective interactions fromC14(p,n)14N studies between 500 and 800 MeV. Physical Review Letters. 65(5). 551–554. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. A. Pickar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Bobyk Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. A. Wood Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. Whitten Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Žáková Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. Hennino Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E. Stephan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. W. Wissink Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by F. Vogler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Strauch
Rankless by CCL
2026