Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Ensemble Properties of Comets: Results from Narrowband Photometry of 85 Comets, 1976-1992
1995678 citationsD. G. Schleicher, D. J. Osip et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of D. J. Osip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. J. Osip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. J. Osip more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. J. Osip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. J. Osip. The network helps show where D. J. Osip may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. J. Osip
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. J. Osip.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. J. Osip based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. J. Osip. D. J. Osip is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Osip, D. J., A. S. Rivkin, Petr Pravec, et al.. (2016). The Observing Working Group for the Asteroid Impact & Delfection Assessment (AIDA) Mission. 48.
10.
Zuluaga, C. A., Molly Kosiarek, D. J. Osip, et al.. (2014). Atmospheric state of Pluto from the 31 July 2014 stellar occultation. DPS.1 indexed citations
11.
Pasachoff, Jay M., Christina H. Seeger, B. A. Babcock, et al.. (2014). Coordinated Occultation Observations for Pluto, Nix, and Quaoar in July 2014. 46.1 indexed citations
12.
Prieto, J. L., D. J. Osip, & Povilas Palunas. (2012). Candidate Progenitor of the Type II SN 2012A in the Near-IR. The astronomer's telegram. 3863. 1.1 indexed citations
13.
Osip, D. J., et al.. (2006). GRB 061007: magellan spectroscopy.. GRB Coordinates Network. 5715. 1.5 indexed citations
14.
Gulbis, A. A. S., J. L. Elliot, Elisabeth R. Adams, et al.. (2005). Charon's Radius and Atmospheric Constraints from the 2005 July 11 Stellar Occultation. DPS.1 indexed citations
15.
Lederer, Susan M., et al.. (1998). Quantitative Analysis of Gas and Dust Jets in Comet Hale-Bopp. 30.1 indexed citations
16.
Osip, D. J., et al.. (1998). Initial Results from Studies of Comet Hale-Bopp and Hyakutake. AAS. 191.1 indexed citations
17.
Osip, D. J., D. G. Schleicher, R. L. Millis, M. F. A’Hearn, & P. V. Birch. (1992). Cometary Dust: Narrowband Photometry of 84 Comets. 24.1 indexed citations
18.
Schleicher, D. G., et al.. (1992). Observational Constraints on Molecular Scalelengths and Lifetimes in Comets. 24.13 indexed citations
19.
Schleicher, D. G., S. J. Bus, & D. J. Osip. (1991). The Anomalous Molecular Abundances of Comet P/Wolf-Harrington. 765. 185.1 indexed citations
20.
Schleicher, D. G., R. L. Millis, D. J. Osip, M. F. A’Hearn, & P. V. Birch. (1989). Thirteen Years of Comet Photometry. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 21. 936.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.