D. Herlth
- Atmospheric Science top 2%
- Atmospheric Ozone and Climate 10
- Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols 10
- Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations 1
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics 10
- Fire effects on ecosystems 1
- Atmospheric aerosols and clouds 1
- Environmental Engineering top 10%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Co-authors
- H. B. SinghD. R. BlakeD. O'HaraJ. D. BradshawPaul J. CrutzenMaria KanakidouG. W. SachseS. T. Sandholm
- Journals
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (9 papers)Geocarto International (1 paper)NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyFrance
In The Last Decade
D. Herlth
11 papers receiving 737 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Atmospheric Science 797
- Global and Planetary Change 503
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 152
- Environmental Engineering 84
- Spectroscopy 97
Countries citing papers authored by D. Herlth
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Herlth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Herlth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Herlth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. Herlth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Herlth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Herlth. The network helps show where D. Herlth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. Herlth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 127 | |
| 3 | In-Situ Measurements of HCN and CH3CN in the Pacific Troposphere: Sources, Sinks, and Comparisons with Spectroscopic Observations | 2002 | 10 |
| 4 | 1996 | 50 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 33 | |
| 6 | Acetone in the atmosphere: Distribution, sources, and sinksbreakdown → | 1994 | 324 |
| 7 | 1994 | 66 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 67 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 61 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 81 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 28 |
About D. Herlth
D. Herlth is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 11 papers that have together received 871 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (10 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (10 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (10 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (1 paper), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (1 paper) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (797 citations), Global and Planetary Change (503 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (152 citations), Environmental Engineering (84 citations) and Spectroscopy (97 citations). D. Herlth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include H. B. Singh, D. R. Blake, D. O'Hara, J. D. Bradshaw, Paul J. Crutzen, Maria Kanakidou, G. W. Sachse, S. T. Sandholm, G. L. Gregory and R. W. Talbot. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Geocarto International and NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.