D. G. Nikles

480 total citations
65 papers, 405 citations indexed

About

D. G. Nikles is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, D. G. Nikles has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 405 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 16 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 10 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in D. G. Nikles's work include Forest ecology and management (25 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (8 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers). D. G. Nikles is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (25 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (8 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers). D. G. Nikles collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Italy and Argentina. D. G. Nikles's co-authors include Mark J. Dieters, D. I. Bevege, Heidi S. Dungey, Mila Bristow, RR Woolaston, Robert J Henry, Timothy A. Holton, R. Arnold, A. C. Matheson and Chris Harwood and has published in prestigious journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Molecular Ecology Resources and Euphytica.

In The Last Decade

D. G. Nikles

46 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
D. G. Nikles Australia	12	198	140	83	82	72	65	405
Philippe Vigneron France	13	244 1.2×	159 1.1×	73 0.9×	29 0.4×	43 0.6×	37	394
Ananda Virgínia de Aguiar Brazil	11	171 0.9×	151 1.1×	76 0.9×	76 0.9×	57 0.8×	82	389
C. C. Lambeth United States	12	309 1.6×	150 1.1×	73 0.9×	31 0.4×	28 0.4×	17	445
William S. Dvorak United States	13	150 0.8×	123 0.9×	118 1.4×	27 0.3×	91 1.3×	24	473
Michael Henson Australia	15	238 1.2×	176 1.3×	76 0.9×	26 0.3×	83 1.2×	33	528
Ken Eldridge Australia	2	207 1.0×	192 1.4×	70 0.8×	25 0.3×	95 1.3×	2	425
David Gwaze United States	13	313 1.6×	136 1.0×	64 0.8×	27 0.3×	27 0.4×	51	499
Brian S. Baltunis Australia	15	408 2.1×	190 1.4×	117 1.4×	21 0.3×	29 0.4×	22	594
Marcela Aparecida de Moraes Brazil	10	115 0.6×	160 1.1×	67 0.8×	74 0.9×	89 1.2×	45	347
C. A. Dean United States	8	223 1.1×	124 0.9×	42 0.5×	29 0.4×	16 0.2×	16	322

Countries citing papers authored by D. G. Nikles

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. G. Nikles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. G. Nikles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. G. Nikles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. G. Nikles

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. G. Nikles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. G. Nikles. The network helps show where D. G. Nikles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. G. Nikles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. G. Nikles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. G. Nikles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. G. Nikles. D. G. Nikles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Evans, Daniel S., Katharina Schulte, Christopher I. Wright, et al.. (2011). Rapid microsatellite marker development for African mahogany (Khaya senegalensis, Meliaceae) using next‐generation sequencing and assessment of its intra‐specific genetic diversity. Molecular Ecology Resources. 12(2). 344–353. 32 indexed citations

Robertson, R. Meldrum, et al.. (2007). Testing and Breeding Forest Trees for Plantations in the Northern Territory. Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries). 2 indexed citations

Bevege, D. I., et al.. (2006). Stand management of Khaya senegalensis (African mahogany) in north Queensland.. 1–16. 1 indexed citations

Robertson, R. Meldrum, et al.. (2006). The occurrence of Hypsipyla shoot borer on species of exotic Meliaceae planted in the Northern Territory.. 1–8. 4 indexed citations

Griffiths, Mark D., et al.. (2006). Khaya and Hypsipyla: findings from current research in Queensland.. 1–25. 3 indexed citations

Bevege, D. I., et al.. (2006). Plantation productivity of Khaya senegalensis (African mahogany) in north Queensland.. 1–19. 1 indexed citations

Bevege, D. I., et al.. (2006). Selecting soils and managing nutrition for Khaya senegalensis.. 1–34. 1 indexed citations

Bevege, D. I., et al.. (2004). Experiences with sandalwood in plantations in the South Pacific and north Queensland.. Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries). 1–9. 2 indexed citations

Arnold, R., et al.. (2004). Determining the climatic suitability of Khaya senegalensis for plantations in Australia.. 1–10. 8 indexed citations

10.

Collins, Rachel J., et al.. (2004). Plantation forestry management principles for the 'dry' tropics of Northern Australia.. 1–8. 1 indexed citations

11.

Lee, David J., et al.. (2001). Prospects of eucalypt species, including interspecific hybrids from South Africa, for hardwood plantations in marginal subtropical environments in Queensland, Australia. The Southern African Forestry Journal. 190(1). 89–94. 11 indexed citations

12.

Gwaze, David, et al.. (2000). Interspecific pine hybrids. I. Genetic parameter estimates in Australia. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 7(1). 11–20. 10 indexed citations

13.

Nikles, D. G., et al.. (1999). A Comparison of the kraft pulp properties of P.elliottiiand theP. elliottiixP. caribaeavar.hondurensishybrid grown in Queensland, Australia. The Southern African Forestry Journal. 186(1). 9–14. 4 indexed citations

14.

Nikles, D. G.. (1998). Management and use of ex situ genetic resources of some tropical Acacia species in Queensland. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 3 indexed citations

15.

Nikles, D. G., et al.. (1996). The first 50 years of the evolution of forest tree improvement in Queensland.. 51–64. 21 indexed citations

16.

Woolaston, RR, et al.. (1991). Genotype-environment interactions in Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis in Queensland, Australia. 1: Population x site interactions. Silvae genetica. 40. 224–228. 13 indexed citations

17.

Woolaston, RR, et al.. (1990). Genetic parameter estimates for Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis in coastal Queensland, Australia.. Silvae genetica. 39(1). 21–28. 16 indexed citations

18.

Dieters, Mark J., RR Woolaston, & D. G. Nikles. (1990). INTERNODE LENGTH OF HOOP PINE: GENETIC PARAMETERS AND PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPING A LONG-INTERNODE BREED. New Zealand journal of forestry science. 20(2). 138–147. 4 indexed citations

19.

Dean, C. A., et al.. (1988). Estimates of genetic parameters and gains expected from selection in hoop pine in south-east Queensland.. Silvae genetica. 37. 243–247. 7 indexed citations

20.

Nikles, D. G., J. Burley, & R.D. Barnes. (1978). Progress and problems of genetic improvement of tropical forest trees. Proceedings of a joint workshop, IUFRO working parties S2.02-08 and S2.03-01, Brisbane, 1977. III. Selection and genetics.. 184–226. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact