Countries citing papers authored by A. C. Matheson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of A. C. Matheson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. C. Matheson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. C. Matheson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. C. Matheson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. C. Matheson. The network helps show where A. C. Matheson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. C. Matheson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. C. Matheson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. C. Matheson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. C. Matheson. A. C. Matheson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Raymond, Carolyn A, et al.. (2009). Effect of Green Density Values on Pinus radiata Stiffness Estimation using a Stress-wave Technique. New Zealand journal of forestry science. 39(1). 71–79.17 indexed citations
Matheson, A. C., Harry X. Wu, David J. Spencer, Carolyn A Raymond, & A. R. Griffin. (2002). Inbreeding in Pinus radiata. III. The effect of inbreeding on age-age correlation and early selection efficiency. Silvae genetica. 51. 115–122.7 indexed citations
Wu, Harry X. & A. C. Matheson. (2000). Analysis of half-diallel mating design with missing crosses : Theory and SAS program for testing and estimating GCA and SCA fixed effects. Silvae genetica. 49(3). 130–137.18 indexed citations
Matheson, A. C., Stephen L. Buchmann, Christopher O’Toole, Paul Westrich, & I. H. Williams. (1996). The conservation of bees (Linnean Society Symposium series 18). Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).17 indexed citations
Matheson, A. C. & Mary L. Reid. (1992). Strategies for the prevention and control of American foulbrood. II. American bee journal. 132(6). 399–402.38 indexed citations
13.
Matheson, A. C., et al.. (1987). Variation among neighbouring and distant provenances of Eucalyptus grandis and E. tereticornis in Zimbabwean field trials.. 17(3). 233–250.26 indexed citations
14.
Lindgren, D. & A. C. Matheson. (1986). An algorithm for increasing the genetic quality of seed from seed orchards by using the better clones in higher proportions. Silvae genetica. 35. 173–177.55 indexed citations
15.
Ferguson, Ian, et al.. (1985). Variation of stem and crowncharacteristics between selected families of hoop pine (Araucaria cunninghamii Ait. ex D. Don).. 15(4). 449–461.2 indexed citations
16.
Matheson, A. C. & Carolyn A Raymond. (1984). Effects of thinning in progeny tests on estimates of genetic parameters in Pinus radiata. Silvae genetica. 33. 125–128.25 indexed citations
17.
Matheson, A. C., et al.. (1980). Variation in wood characteristics in thinnings from a field trial of Eucalyptus obliqua.. 10(3). 239–247.5 indexed citations
18.
Matheson, A. C.. (1980). Unexpectedly high frequencies of outcrossed seedlings among offspring from mixtures of self and cross pollen in Pinus radiata D. Don.. 10(1). 21–27.9 indexed citations
19.
Moran, G. F., J.G. Bell, & A. C. Matheson. (1980). The genetic structure and levels of inbreeding in a Pinus radiata D. Don seed orchard.. Silvae genetica. 29. 190–193.33 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.