Д. Эберт

7.8k total citations
168 papers, 5.6k citations indexed

About

Д. Эберт is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Д. Эберт has authored 168 papers receiving a total of 5.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 147 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 30 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 15 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in Д. Эберт's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (137 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (102 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (87 papers). Д. Эберт is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (137 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (102 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (87 papers). Д. Эберт collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Japan. Д. Эберт's co-authors include V. O. Galkin, Р. Н. Фаустов, Hugo Reinhardt, К. Г. Клименко, M. K. Volkov, A. P. Martynenko, V. Ch. Zhukovsky, V. L. Yudichev, A. S. Vshivtsev and Wolfgang Lucha and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Д. Эберт

160 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Д. Эберт Germany	37	5.3k	650	351	327	161	168	5.6k
Reinhard Alkofer Germany	39	5.9k 1.1×	1.1k 1.7×	269 0.8×	225 0.7×	161 1.0×	156	6.2k
J. Knoll Germany	26	1.9k 0.4×	653 1.0×	359 1.0×	155 0.5×	243 1.5×	65	2.3k
Olaf Kaczmarek Germany	39	6.6k 1.2×	454 0.7×	818 2.3×	362 1.1×	102 0.6×	134	6.7k
Thomas D. Cohen United States	33	3.5k 0.7×	637 1.0×	357 1.0×	209 0.6×	194 1.2×	178	4.0k
E. Laermann Germany	43	8.5k 1.6×	620 1.0×	1.2k 3.5×	622 1.9×	151 0.9×	139	8.7k
Ralf Rapp United States	47	6.3k 1.2×	460 0.7×	771 2.2×	278 0.9×	73 0.5×	166	6.7k
Gunnar Bali Germany	39	5.4k 1.0×	478 0.7×	603 1.7×	441 1.3×	72 0.4×	132	5.6k
William Detmold United States	43	4.6k 0.9×	568 0.9×	310 0.9×	244 0.7×	90 0.6×	184	4.9k
Tetsuo Matsui Japan	24	2.8k 0.5×	840 1.3×	390 1.1×	569 1.7×	102 0.6×	113	3.6k
Jiunn-Wei Chen Taiwan	37	3.6k 0.7×	570 0.9×	499 1.4×	147 0.4×	143 0.9×	123	3.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Д. Эберт

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Д. Эберт's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Д. Эберт with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Д. Эберт more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Д. Эберт

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Д. Эберт. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Д. Эберт. The network helps show where Д. Эберт may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Д. Эберт

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Д. Эберт. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Д. Эберт based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Д. Эберт. Д. Эберт is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Эберт, Д., et al.. (2024). Shape uncertainty quantification of Maxwell eigenvalues and -modes with application to TESLA cavities. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 428. 117108–117108.

Blaschke, D., et al.. (2018). Effects of Composite Pions on the Chiral Condensate within the PNJL Model at Finite Temperature. Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters. 15(3). 230–235. 7 indexed citations

Эберт, Д., et al.. (2016). Phase transitions in hexagonal, graphene-like lattice sheets and nanotubes under the influence of external conditions. Annals of Physics. 371. 254–286. 18 indexed citations

Эберт, Д., et al.. (2008). Dynamical breaking and restoration of chiral and color symmetries for an accelerated observer and in the static Einstein universe. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical. 41(16). 164064–164064. 1 indexed citations

Эберт, Д., Р. Н. Фаустов, & V. O. Galkin. (2007). Masses of excited heavy baryons in the relativistic quark model. arXiv (Cornell University). 31 indexed citations

Эберт, Д., Р. Н. Фаустов, & V. O. Galkin. (2006). Semileptonic decays of heavy baryons in the relativistic quark model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 73(9). 66 indexed citations

Эберт, Д. & К. Г. Клименко. (2005). Gapless pion condensation in quark matter with finite baryon density. arXiv (Cornell University). 5 indexed citations

Клименко, К. Г. & Д. Эберт. (2005). Magnetic catalysis of stability of quark matter in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 68(1). 124–130. 6 indexed citations

Эберт, Д., Р. Н. Фаустов, & V. O. Galkin. (2003). MASS SPECTRA OF HEAVY-LIGHT HADRONS IN THE RELATIVISTIC QUARK MODEL. 422–424. 3 indexed citations

10.

Эберт, Д., Р. Н. Фаустов, & V. O. Galkin. (2002). Radiative M1-decays of heavy–light mesons in the relativistic quark model. Physics Letters B. 537(3-4). 241–248. 39 indexed citations

11.

Эберт, Д., et al.. (2001). Chromomagnetic catalysis of chiral symmetry breaking and color superconductivity. Prepared for. 3 indexed citations

12.

Эберт, Д., К. Г. Клименко, H. Toki, & V. Ch. Zhukovsky. (2001). Chromomagnetic Catalysis of Color Superconductivity and Dimensional Reduction. Progress of Theoretical Physics. 106(4). 835–849. 13 indexed citations

13.

Антонов, Д.В. & Д. Эберт. (1998). Topological term in the string representation of the Wilson loop in the dilute instanton gas approximation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 58(6). 2 indexed citations

14.

Эберт, Д., Р. Н. Фаустов, & V. O. Galkin. (1997). Exclusive nonleptonic decays ofBmesons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 56(1). 312–320. 15 indexed citations

15.

Эберт, Д. & M. K. Volkov. (1996). Kaon polarizability in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model at zero and finite temperatures. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 60(5). 796–803. 1 indexed citations

16.

Böhm, G., et al.. (1993). On the origin of the enhancement of CP-violating charge asymmetries in K±→3π decays predicted from chiral theory. Physics Letters B. 300(3). 283–292. 5 indexed citations

17.

Dubnička, S., Д. Эберт, & Andrey A. Sazonov. (1991). Standard model and beyond : from LEP to UNK and LHC : First International Triangle Workshop JINR-CERN-IHEP, 1-5 October 1990, Dubna, USSR. WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks. 2 indexed citations

18.

Эберт, Д., et al.. (1983). Bag Model Matrix Elements of the Parity Violating Weak Hamiltonian for Charmed Baryons. 40. 1250–1255. 7 indexed citations

19.

Volkov, M. K. & Д. Эберт. (1982). FOUR - QUARK INTERACTIONS AS A COMMON SOURCE OF THE VECTOR MESON DOMINANCE AND SIGMA MODEL. (IN RUSSIAN). 36. 1265–1277. 50 indexed citations

20.

Volkov, M. K. & Д. Эберт. (1982). Four-quark interactions as a common dynamical basis of the sigma model and the vector dominance model. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. (Engl. Transl.); (United States).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact