Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Enceladus' Water Vapor Plume
2006414 citationsL. W. Esposito, J. E. Colwell et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by D. E. Shemansky
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of D. E. Shemansky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. E. Shemansky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. E. Shemansky more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. E. Shemansky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. E. Shemansky. The network helps show where D. E. Shemansky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. E. Shemansky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. E. Shemansky.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. E. Shemansky based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. E. Shemansky. D. E. Shemansky is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Esposito, L. W., J. E. Colwell, Amanda Hendrix, et al.. (2015). Deriving the Structure and Composition of Enceladus’ Plume from Cassini UVIS Observations. DPS.1 indexed citations
Sittler, E. C., C. Bertucci, A. J. Coates, et al.. (2008). Energy Deposition Processes in Titan's Upper Atmosphere. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
4.
Shemansky, D. E.. (2006). Atmospheric Structure of Saturn and Titan: Results from the Cassini UVIS Experiment. 36. 2756.1 indexed citations
5.
Hendrix, Amanda, L. W. Esposito, J. E. Colwell, et al.. (2005). Cassini UltraViolet Imaging Spectrograph (UVIS) Observations of Enceladus' Plume. AGUFM. 2005.1 indexed citations
Hall, D. T. & D. E. Shemansky. (1988). The Evidence Against an Inner Solar System Source of Atomic Hydrogen. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 20. 836.3 indexed citations
Hall, D. T., et al.. (1986). Helium in Collisional Equilibrium with an Electron Gas. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 18. 1004.1 indexed citations
16.
Bagenal, F. & D. E. Shemansky. (1985). Ion Partitioning in the Io Torus: Voyager I PLS vs. UVS Experiments. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 17. 694.1 indexed citations
Shemansky, D. E. & Robert A. Brown. (1982). A Deficiency of OIII in the Io Plasma Torus.. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 14. 763.19 indexed citations
20.
Shemansky, D. E. & B. R. Sandel. (1980). Radial Dependence of the Io Plasma Torus Spectrum in the EUV.. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 12. 674.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.