Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Hadean age for a post-magma-ocean zircon confirmed by atom-probe tomography
2014335 citationsJohn W. Valley, Aaron J. Cavosie et al.Nature Geoscienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of D. E. Moser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. E. Moser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. E. Moser more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. E. Moser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. E. Moser. The network helps show where D. E. Moser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. E. Moser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. E. Moser.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. E. Moser based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. E. Moser. D. E. Moser is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
White, L. F., D. E. Moser, James Darling, et al.. (2021). Accessory Mineral Chronology of Eucrites Reveals New Insights into the Formation, Evolution, and Bombardment of Vesta. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2124.1 indexed citations
Kizovski, T. V., L. F. White, K. T. Tait, et al.. (2019). Identifying the Effects of Shock on the Composition of Martian Phosphate Minerals Using Correlative Structural and Chemical Techniques. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2731.1 indexed citations
Crow, C. A., Ben Jacobsen, D. E. Moser, K. D. McKeegan, & Peter Weber. (2016). NanoSIMS U-PB Dating of Shocked Zircons. 79(1921). 6507.1 indexed citations
13.
Crow, C. A., Ben Jacobsen, K. D. McKeegan, & D. E. Moser. (2015). Investigating Zircon Shock Microstructures with NanoSIMS. LPI. 2470.1 indexed citations
14.
Hyde, B. C., et al.. (2013). Use of Micro-CT and Precision Cutting to Assess Meteorite Heterogeneity: An Example Using Brachinite NWA 4872. Meteoritics and Planetary Science Supplement. 76. 5301.1 indexed citations
Tait, K. T., et al.. (2013). Mineralogical Investigation of the Phosphorus-Rich Springwater Pallasite. Meteoritics and Planetary Science. 48. 5276.2 indexed citations
17.
Cavosie, Aaron J., et al.. (2011). A Search for Shocked Zircons in Impact Horizons from the Barberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2236.2 indexed citations
18.
Erickson, Timmons M., Aaron J. Cavosie, H. A. Radovan, D. E. Moser, & J. L. Wooden. (2011). Microstructural and Isotopic Constraints on Impact Basin Provenance of Detrital Shocked Minerals in the Vaal River, South Africa. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2208.1 indexed citations
McCausland, P. J. A., Peter Brown, A. R. Hildebrand, et al.. (2010). Fall of the Grimsby H5 Chondrite. LPI. 2716.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.