D. C. Teas

1.4k total citations
40 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

D. C. Teas is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, D. C. Teas has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 papers in Sensory Systems and 10 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in D. C. Teas's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (26 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (16 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers). D. C. Teas is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (26 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (16 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers). D. C. Teas collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. D. C. Teas's co-authors include Donald H. Eldredge, Hallowell Davis, Lloyd A. Jeffress, T. T. Sandel, W. E. Feddersen, N. Y-S. Kiang, S.J. Kramer, Alan J. Klein, T. Konishi and D. A. Benson and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain Research, Annual Review of Psychology and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

D. C. Teas

40 papers receiving 926 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. C. Teas United States 15 854 527 230 104 93 40 1.0k
George Moushegian United States 21 1.0k 1.2× 743 1.4× 192 0.8× 196 1.9× 53 0.6× 50 1.3k
Ben M. Clopton United States 16 726 0.9× 617 1.2× 119 0.5× 64 0.6× 70 0.8× 38 947
D. J. Anderson United States 9 940 1.1× 680 1.3× 160 0.7× 102 1.0× 55 0.6× 12 1.3k
E. C. Moxon United States 6 890 1.0× 782 1.5× 186 0.8× 52 0.5× 59 0.6× 6 1.1k
M. Don United States 15 1.0k 1.2× 717 1.4× 280 1.2× 99 1.0× 151 1.6× 22 1.3k
Allen L. Rupert United States 21 1.1k 1.3× 796 1.5× 181 0.8× 210 2.0× 49 0.5× 38 1.5k
Gordon Flottorp Norway 16 523 0.6× 314 0.6× 221 1.0× 91 0.9× 144 1.5× 40 927
Evan M. Relkin United States 15 584 0.7× 501 1.0× 161 0.7× 60 0.6× 41 0.4× 27 721
Donal G. Sinex United States 21 817 1.0× 491 0.9× 140 0.6× 152 1.5× 88 0.9× 52 1.0k
Bruce H. Deatherage United States 15 385 0.5× 312 0.6× 136 0.6× 94 0.9× 43 0.5× 31 710

Countries citing papers authored by D. C. Teas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. C. Teas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. C. Teas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. C. Teas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. C. Teas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. C. Teas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. C. Teas. The network helps show where D. C. Teas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. C. Teas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. C. Teas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. C. Teas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. C. Teas. D. C. Teas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Teas, D. C.. (1989). Auditory Physiology: Present Trends. Annual Review of Psychology. 40(1). 405–429. 7 indexed citations
2.
Kramer, Steven J. & D. C. Teas. (1982). Forward masking of auditory nerve and brainstem responses using high-pass noise maskers. Hearing Research. 8(3). 317–337. 6 indexed citations
3.
Kramer, S.J. & D. C. Teas. (1982). Forward masking of auditory nerve (N1) and brainstem (wave V) responses in humans. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 72(3). 795–803. 31 indexed citations
4.
Teas, D. C., Alan J. Klein, & S.J. Kramer. (1982). An analysis of auditory brainstem responses in infants. Hearing Research. 7(1). 19–54. 40 indexed citations
5.
Legouix, J. P., et al.. (1978). Relation Between the Waveform of the Cochlear Whole Nerve Action Potential and Its Intensity Function. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 85(3-4). 177–183. 14 indexed citations
6.
Legouix, J. P., et al.. (1978). Relation Between The Waveform Of The Cochlear Whole Nerve Action Potential And Its Intensity Function. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 85(1-6). 177–183. 5 indexed citations
7.
Klein, Alan J. & D. C. Teas. (1978). Acoustically dependent latency shifts of BSER (wave V) in man. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 63(6). 1887–1895. 44 indexed citations
8.
Beagley, H. A., et al.. (1977). Electrocochleographic changes in acoustic neuroma: some experimental findings. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2(3). 213–219. 8 indexed citations
9.
Teas, D. C., et al.. (1975). Interaural attenuation versus frequency for guinea pig and chinchilla CM response. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 58(5). 1066–1072. 16 indexed citations
10.
Turner, Robert G., et al.. (1975). Discharges of auditory nerve fibers in the alligator lizard in relation to basilar papilla morphology. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 58(S1). S103–S103. 2 indexed citations
11.
Benson, D. A. & D. C. Teas. (1972). Human auditory-evoked response: Specific effects of signal strength and performance criterion. Perception & Psychophysics. 11(3). 203–208. 8 indexed citations
12.
Teas, D. C., et al.. (1970). Effects of Electrical Current Applied to Cochlear Partition on Discharges in Individual Auditory-Nerve Fibers. II. Interaction of Electrical Polarization and Acoustic Stimulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 47(6B). 1527–1537. 33 indexed citations
13.
Teas, D. C., et al.. (1969). Scalp Responses from Human Subjects Evoked by Contingent Noise Bursts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 46(1A_Supplement). 113–114. 1 indexed citations
14.
Teas, D. C., et al.. (1969). Auditory Nerve Responses as a Function of Repetition Rate and Background Noise. International Audiology. 8(1). 147–163. 4 indexed citations
15.
Teas, D. C., et al.. (1968). Amplitude Distributions of Cochlear Microphonic Response to an Acoustic Sinusoid in Noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 11(1). 63–76. 1 indexed citations
16.
Teas, D. C.. (1966). Interactions between Synchronous Neural Responses to Paired Acoustic Signals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 39(6). 1077–1085. 9 indexed citations
17.
Teas, D. C. & N. Y-S. Kiang. (1964). Evoked responses from the auditory cortex. Experimental Neurology. 10(2). 91–119. 81 indexed citations
18.
Teas, D. C.. (1962). Lateralization of Acoustic Transients. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 34(9B). 1460–1465. 11 indexed citations
19.
Feddersen, W. E., T. T. Sandel, D. C. Teas, & Lloyd A. Jeffress. (1955). Measurements of Interaural Time- and Intensity-Differences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 27(5_Supplement). 1008–1008. 1 indexed citations
20.
Sandel, T. T., D. C. Teas, W. E. Feddersen, & Lloyd A. Jeffress. (1955). Localization of Sound from Single and Paired Sources. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 27(5). 842–852. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026