Cynthia Chang
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Co-authors
- Melinda D. SmithBenjamin L. TurnerMeghan L. AvolioKimberly J. La PierreElisabeth J. ForrestelKarin T. BurghardtThomas H. SibleyLauren M. Hallett
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers)Plant and animal studies (9 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationEcological ModelingEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCzechia
In The Last Decade
Cynthia Chang
22 papers receiving 618 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 333
- Ecology 242
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 202
- Plant Science 173
- Global and Planetary Change 154
Countries citing papers authored by Cynthia Chang
This map shows the geographic impact of Cynthia Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cynthia Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cynthia Chang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cynthia Chang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cynthia Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cynthia Chang. The network helps show where Cynthia Chang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cynthia Chang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cynthia Chang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cynthia Chang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cynthia Chang. Cynthia Chang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 144 | |
| 6 | 180 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | A Nanopublication Framework for Biological Networks using Cytoscape.js. | 1 |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 62 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Cynthia Chang
Cynthia Chang is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers), Plant and animal studies (9 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (333 citations), Ecological Modeling (69 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (202 citations). Cynthia Chang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Melinda D. Smith, Benjamin L. Turner, Meghan L. Avolio, Kimberly J. La Pierre, Elisabeth J. Forrestel, Karin T. Burghardt, Thomas H. Sibley, Lauren M. Hallett, Roger del Moral and Janneke HilleRisLambers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, PLoS ONE and New Phytologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.