Curtis W. Spencer
- Surgery top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Leon L. WiltseJames C. ThomasMichael R. ZindrickDouglas W. JacksonJames B. ReynoldsWilliam V. GlennRichard D. GuyerRichard D. Peek
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (9 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (7 papers)Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Curtis W. Spencer
13 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Surgery 1.2k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.1k
- Pharmacology 367
- Biomedical Engineering 184
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 40
Countries citing papers authored by Curtis W. Spencer
This map shows the geographic impact of Curtis W. Spencer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Curtis W. Spencer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Curtis W. Spencer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Curtis W. Spencer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Curtis W. Spencer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Curtis W. Spencer. The network helps show where Curtis W. Spencer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Curtis W. Spencer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Curtis W. Spencer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Curtis W. Spencer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Curtis W. Spencer. Curtis W. Spencer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 212 | |
| 5 | 216 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | Dorsolumbar kyphosis or Scheuermann's disease. | 4 |
| 9 | A Biomechanical Study of Intrapeduncular Screw Fixation in the Lumbosacral Spinebreakdown → | 497 |
| 10 | 132 | |
| 11 | 122 | |
| 12 | Back injuries in the athlete. | 28 |
| 13 | 27 |
About Curtis W. Spencer
Curtis W. Spencer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (9 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (7 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.1k citations), Surgery (1.2k citations) and Pharmacology (367 citations). Curtis W. Spencer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Leon L. Wiltse, James C. Thomas, Michael R. Zindrick, Douglas W. Jackson, James B. Reynolds, William V. Glenn, Richard D. Guyer, Richard D. Peek, James N. Weinstein and Andrew Y. Ng. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Clinics in Sports Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.