Curtis W. Conroy
- Molecular Biology
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 5%
- Pharmacology
- Co-authors
- Thomas H. MarenT. H. MarenJames E. ErmanGeorge C. WynnsPaul D. TymaPeter H. DaumAmir Bar-IlanClaudiu T. Supuran
- Topics
- Enzyme function and inhibition (9 papers)Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (4 papers)Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Medicinal ChemistryJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyJapan
In The Last Decade
Curtis W. Conroy
21 papers receiving 564 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Molecular Biology 402
- Organic Chemistry 166
- Ophthalmology 101
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 93
- Pharmacology 73
Countries citing papers authored by Curtis W. Conroy
This map shows the geographic impact of Curtis W. Conroy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Curtis W. Conroy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Curtis W. Conroy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Curtis W. Conroy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Curtis W. Conroy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Curtis W. Conroy. The network helps show where Curtis W. Conroy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Curtis W. Conroy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Curtis W. Conroy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Curtis W. Conroy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Curtis W. Conroy. Curtis W. Conroy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 50 | |
| 4 | 48 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 87 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Curtis W. Conroy
Curtis W. Conroy is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Ophthalmology and Electrochemistry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme function and inhibition (9 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (4 papers) and Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (101 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (93 citations) and Molecular Biology (402 citations). Curtis W. Conroy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Thomas H. Maren, T. H. Maren, James E. Erman, George C. Wynns, Paul D. Tyma, Peter H. Daum, Amir Bar-Ilan, Claudiu T. Supuran, Norman S. Levy and William F. Brechue. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.