Curtis Fatig

488 total citations
14 papers, 36 citations indexed

About

Curtis Fatig is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Curtis Fatig has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 36 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 6 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 4 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Curtis Fatig's work include Spacecraft Design and Technology (6 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers) and Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (4 papers). Curtis Fatig is often cited by papers focused on Spacecraft Design and Technology (6 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers) and Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (4 papers). Curtis Fatig collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Curtis Fatig's co-authors include Margarita Mooney, Ronald C. Jones, A. R. Martel, Randy A. Kimble, Alan Johns, Brian J. Comber, Alistair Glasse, Douglas Kelly, Joseph Sullivan and Stephan M. Birkmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings - IEEE Aerospace Conference, NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

In The Last Decade

Curtis Fatig

12 papers receiving 32 citations

Peers

Curtis Fatig
J. Anais Chile
E. F. Bauermeister South Africa
E. S. Saunders United Kingdom
Joseph Pitman United States
J. Farthing United Kingdom
Tim C. Chuter United States
M. C. Sánchez United States
Curtis Fatig
Citations per year, relative to Curtis Fatig Curtis Fatig (= 1×) peers Gregory P. Dubois-Felsmann

Countries citing papers authored by Curtis Fatig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Curtis Fatig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Curtis Fatig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Curtis Fatig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Curtis Fatig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Curtis Fatig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Curtis Fatig. The network helps show where Curtis Fatig may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Curtis Fatig

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Curtis Fatig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Curtis Fatig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Curtis Fatig. Curtis Fatig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Kimble, Randy A., Stephan M. Birkmann, Brian J. Comber, et al.. (2016). Cryo-vacuum testing of the JWST Integrated Science Instrument Module. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9904. 990408–990408. 9 indexed citations
2.
Wasiak, Francis, William Ochs, Alan Johns, et al.. (2012). The building blocks for JWST I&T to operations: from simulator to flight units. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8448. 844803–844803.
3.
Johns, Alan, et al.. (2008). James Webb Space Telescope: applying lessons learned to I&T. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7016. 70160E–70160E.
4.
Fatig, Curtis, et al.. (2008). Evolution of the Lunar Network. Proceedings - IEEE Aerospace Conference. 1–12. 7 indexed citations
5.
Johns, Alan, et al.. (2008). James Webb Space Telescope: L2 communications for science data processing. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7016. 70161D–70161D. 3 indexed citations
6.
Fatig, Curtis, et al.. (2008). XTCE and XML Database Evolution and Lessons from JWST, LandSat, and Constellation. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2 indexed citations
7.
Fatig, Curtis, et al.. (2007). The Earth Based Ground Stations Element of the Lunar Program. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 1 indexed citations
8.
Fatig, Curtis, et al.. (2006). James Webb Space Telescope XML Database: From the Beginning to Today. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1–7. 2 indexed citations
9.
Fatig, Curtis. (2006). Exchanging Databases with Dissimilar Systems Using CCSDS XTCE. 2 indexed citations
10.
Fatig, Curtis, et al.. (2005). L2-James Webb Space Telescope operationally friendly environment?. 105–110. 2 indexed citations
11.
Fatig, Curtis, et al.. (2004). XML - James Webb space telescope database issues, lessons, and status. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 3306–3312. 3 indexed citations
12.
Mooney, Margarita, et al.. (2004). L2-james webb space telescope's communication challenges. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 3. 3_1433–3_1440. 2 indexed citations
13.
Steck, Jane A., et al.. (2003). Low cost ground systems - Fantasy or reality. Proceedings - IEEE Aerospace Conference. 7. 7–3195. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026