Curtis E. Beus

855 total citations
10 papers, 608 citations indexed

About

Curtis E. Beus is a scholar working on Plant Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Curtis E. Beus has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 608 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Plant Science, 6 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 5 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Curtis E. Beus's work include Organic Food and Agriculture (7 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (6 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (3 papers). Curtis E. Beus is often cited by papers focused on Organic Food and Agriculture (7 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (6 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (3 papers). Curtis E. Beus collaborates with scholars based in United States. Curtis E. Beus's co-authors include Riley E. Dunlap, Don A. Dillman and John E. Carlson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Rural Sociology and Journal of Consumer Affairs.

In The Last Decade

Curtis E. Beus

10 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Curtis E. Beus United States	9	356	315	126	77	66	10	608
Ann Waters‐Bayer France	11	152 0.4×	306 1.0×	126 1.0×	53 0.7×	57 0.9×	50	678
Robert E. Rhoades United States	12	180 0.5×	234 0.7×	88 0.7×	54 0.7×	115 1.7×	35	737
Leslie A. Duram United States	14	251 0.7×	175 0.6×	96 0.8×	60 0.8×	82 1.2×	39	605
Ronnie Vernooy Italy	17	286 0.8×	322 1.0×	90 0.7×	87 1.1×	108 1.6×	81	966
Egon Noe Denmark	18	275 0.8×	199 0.6×	84 0.7×	134 1.7×	82 1.2×	73	683
Paulo Petersen France	13	395 1.1×	565 1.8×	119 0.9×	134 1.7×	65 1.0×	25	972
Hilde Bjørkhaug Norway	14	245 0.7×	333 1.1×	56 0.4×	94 1.2×	77 1.2×	38	666
Catherine Laurent France	15	203 0.6×	436 1.4×	99 0.8×	48 0.6×	141 2.1×	46	836
Jacqui Dibden Australia	11	305 0.9×	221 0.7×	58 0.5×	75 1.0×	54 0.8×	14	665
Benjamin E. Graeub Italy	5	219 0.6×	340 1.1×	54 0.4×	114 1.5×	34 0.5×	6	701

Countries citing papers authored by Curtis E. Beus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Curtis E. Beus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Curtis E. Beus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Curtis E. Beus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Curtis E. Beus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Curtis E. Beus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Curtis E. Beus. The network helps show where Curtis E. Beus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Curtis E. Beus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Curtis E. Beus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Curtis E. Beus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Curtis E. Beus. Curtis E. Beus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Beus, Curtis E. & Riley E. Dunlap. (1994). Endorsement of Agrarian Ideology and Adherence to Agricultural Paradigms¹. Rural Sociology. 59(3). 462–484. 28 indexed citations

2.

Carlson, John E., et al.. (1994). Changes in the soil conservation attitudes and behaviors of farmers in the Palouse and Camas prairies: 1976-1990. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 49(5). 493–500. 20 indexed citations

3.

Beus, Curtis E. & Riley E. Dunlap. (1994). Agricultural Paradigms and the Practice of Agriculture¹. Rural Sociology. 59(4). 620–635. 55 indexed citations

4.

Dunlap, Riley E., et al.. (1993). What is Sustainable Agriculture?. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 3(1). 5–41. 53 indexed citations

5.

Beus, Curtis E. & Riley E. Dunlap. (1993). Agricultural policy debates: Examining the alternative and conventional perspectives. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 8(3). 98–106. 10 indexed citations

6.

Beus, Curtis E., John E. Carlson, Don A. Dillman, & Riley E. Dunlap. (1992). PALOUSE FARMERS' PERCEPTIONS OF IMPACTS FROM WIDESPREAD ADOPTION OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES. Impact Assessment. 10(2). 27–41. 2 indexed citations

7.

Dunlap, Riley E. & Curtis E. Beus. (1992). Understanding Public Concerns About Pesticides: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 26(2). 418–438. 58 indexed citations

8.

Beus, Curtis E. & Riley E. Dunlap. (1992). The Alternative‐Conventional Agriculture Debate: Where Do Agricultural Faculty Stand?¹. Rural Sociology. 57(3). 363–380. 27 indexed citations

9.

Beus, Curtis E. & Riley E. Dunlap. (1991). Measuring Adherence to Alternative vs. Conventional Agricultural Paradigms: A Proposed Scale*. Rural Sociology. 56(3). 432–460. 71 indexed citations

10.

Beus, Curtis E. & Riley E. Dunlap. (1990). Conventional versus Alternative Agriculture: The Paradigmatic Roots of the Debate*. Rural Sociology. 55(4). 590–616. 284 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact