C-ting Wu

1.0k total citations
11 papers, 707 citations indexed

About

C-ting Wu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, C-ting Wu has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 707 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Molecular Biology, 9 papers in Plant Science and 7 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in C-ting Wu's work include Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (9 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4 papers). C-ting Wu is often cited by papers focused on Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (9 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4 papers). C-ting Wu collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. C-ting Wu's co-authors include Jack R Bateman, Anne M. Lee, James Morris, Adnan Derti, George M. Church, Frederick P. Roth, Jelena Erceg, Eric F. Joyce, Michael F. Chou and Daniel Schwartz and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Genetics, Nature Methods and Genetics.

In The Last Decade

C-ting Wu

11 papers receiving 700 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C-ting Wu United States 10 604 242 217 89 36 11 707
Sandra L. Schnakenberg United States 5 486 0.8× 115 0.5× 171 0.8× 56 0.6× 38 1.1× 5 616
Reazur Rahman United States 14 614 1.0× 236 1.0× 66 0.3× 145 1.6× 25 0.7× 18 797
Metewo Selase Enuameh United States 8 577 1.0× 85 0.4× 145 0.7× 57 0.6× 43 1.2× 11 698
Stuart I. Tsubota United States 13 481 0.8× 213 0.9× 112 0.5× 56 0.6× 21 0.6× 23 561
Gretchen Calhoun United States 10 417 0.7× 97 0.4× 192 0.9× 47 0.5× 48 1.3× 11 541
Katharina Schernhuber Austria 7 1.0k 1.7× 186 0.8× 168 0.8× 149 1.7× 27 0.8× 11 1.2k
Stanley Tiong Canada 14 597 1.0× 143 0.6× 180 0.8× 104 1.2× 20 0.6× 24 707
Zhilian Jia China 7 836 1.4× 215 0.9× 154 0.7× 49 0.6× 16 0.4× 9 887
Justin P. Blumenstiel United States 20 958 1.6× 642 2.7× 245 1.1× 79 0.9× 51 1.4× 35 1.3k
Heike Taubert Germany 15 821 1.4× 150 0.6× 242 1.1× 165 1.9× 26 0.7× 17 914

Countries citing papers authored by C-ting Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C-ting Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C-ting Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C-ting Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C-ting Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C-ting Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C-ting Wu. The network helps show where C-ting Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C-ting Wu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C-ting Wu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C-ting Wu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C-ting Wu. C-ting Wu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Joyce, Eric F., Jelena Erceg, & C-ting Wu. (2016). Pairing and anti-pairing: a balancing act in the diploid genome. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 37. 119–128. 53 indexed citations
2.
Savova, Virginia, Sung Chun, Mashaal Sohail, et al.. (2016). Genes with monoallelic expression contribute disproportionately to genetic diversity in humans. Nature Genetics. 48(3). 231–237. 41 indexed citations
3.
Thompson, Morgan N., Alexey A. Soshnev, Jian Wu, et al.. (2012). Restoration of Topoisomerase 2 Function by Complementation of Defective Monomers in Drosophila. Genetics. 192(3). 843–856. 9 indexed citations
4.
Griffin, Ruth, Anne Sustar, Richard Binari, et al.. (2009). The twin spot generator for differential Drosophila lineage analysis. Nature Methods. 6(8). 600–602. 48 indexed citations
5.
Bateman, Jack R & C-ting Wu. (2008). A Simple Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Method for the Construction of Recombinase-Mediated Cassette Exchange Donor Vectors. Genetics. 180(3). 1763–1766. 23 indexed citations
6.
Chiang, Charleston W. K., Adnan Derti, Daniel Schwartz, et al.. (2008). Ultraconserved Elements: Analyses of Dosage Sensitivity, Motifs and Boundaries. Genetics. 180(4). 2277–2293. 28 indexed citations
7.
Bateman, Jack R & C-ting Wu. (2008). A Genomewide Survey Argues That Every Zygotic Gene Product Is Dispensable for the Initiation of Somatic Homolog Pairing in Drosophila. Genetics. 180(3). 1329–1342. 19 indexed citations
8.
Derti, Adnan, Frederick P. Roth, George M. Church, & C-ting Wu. (2006). Mammalian ultraconserved elements are strongly depleted among segmental duplications and copy number variants. Nature Genetics. 38(10). 1216–1220. 83 indexed citations
9.
Bateman, Jack R, Anne M. Lee, & C-ting Wu. (2006). Site-Specific Transformation of Drosophila via ϕC31 Integrase-Mediated Cassette Exchange. Genetics. 173(2). 769–777. 259 indexed citations
11.
Wu, C-ting & James Morris. (1999). Transvection and other homology effects. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 9(2). 237–246. 114 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026