Craig R. Rush
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- William W. StoopsMark T. FillmoreLon R. HaysJoshua A. LilePaul E.A. GlaserScott H. KollinsRobert W. BakerThomas H. Kelly
- Topics
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (127 papers)Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (45 papers)Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (36 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanGermany
In The Last Decade
Craig R. Rush
188 papers receiving 5.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 3.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.9k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.5k
- Pharmacology 1.2k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 983
Countries citing papers authored by Craig R. Rush
This map shows the geographic impact of Craig R. Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig R. Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig R. Rush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Craig R. Rush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig R. Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig R. Rush. The network helps show where Craig R. Rush may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig R. Rush
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig R. Rush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig R. Rush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig R. Rush. Craig R. Rush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 49 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 86 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | 81 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 91 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Craig R. Rush
Craig R. Rush is a scholar working on Toxicology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 193 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (127 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (45 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (36 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.3k citations), Toxicology (596 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (1.5k citations). Craig R. Rush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include William W. Stoops, Mark T. Fillmore, Lon R. Hays, Joshua A. Lile, Paul E.A. Glaser, Scott H. Kollins, Robert W. Baker, Thomas H. Kelly, Peggy J. Pazzaglia and Roland R. Griffiths. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Pharmacological Reviews and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.