442 total citations 7 papers, 211 citations indexed
About
Craig Loftus is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Human-Computer Interaction and Social Psychology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Craig Loftus has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 211 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Information Systems and Management, 3 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Craig Loftus's work include Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (3 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers). Craig Loftus is often cited by papers focused on Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (3 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers). Craig Loftus collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Craig Loftus's co-authors include Ben Hicks, Chris McMahon, Christopher McMahon, Linda Newnes and Andy Dong and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Explore Bristol Research and Bristol Research (University of Bristol).
Citations per year, relative to Craig Loftus Craig Loftus (= 1×)
peers
Stephen Culley
Countries citing papers authored by Craig Loftus
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Loftus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Loftus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Loftus more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Loftus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Loftus. The network helps show where Craig Loftus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig Loftus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig Loftus.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig Loftus based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Craig Loftus. Craig Loftus is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Loftus, Craig, Chris McMahon, & Ben Hicks. (2013). International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 13).53 indexed citations
2.
Loftus, Craig, Chris McMahon, & Ben Hicks. (2013). Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED.105 indexed citations
Loftus, Craig, Ben Hicks, & Christopher McMahon. (2010). UNDERSTANDING THE USE OF EMAIL IN ENGINEERING: A SCENARIO BASED APPROACH. Explore Bristol Research. 1575–1584.1 indexed citations
5.
Loftus, Craig, Ben Hicks, & Christopher McMahon. (2009). European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.14 indexed citations
6.
Loftus, Craig, Ben Hicks, & Christopher McMahon. (2009). Capturing key relationships and stakeholders over the product lifecycle: an email based approach. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).4 indexed citations
7.
Loftus, Craig, Christopher McMahon, & Ben Hicks. (2008). Issues and challenges for improving email use in engineering design. The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath). 232–242.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.