Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Dynamic World, Near real-time global 10 m land use land cover mapping
This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Hanson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Hanson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Hanson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Hanson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Hanson. The network helps show where Craig Hanson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig Hanson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig Hanson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig Hanson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Craig Hanson. Craig Hanson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Steer, Andrew C. & Craig Hanson. (2021). Corporate Financing of Nature Based Solutions: What Next?.1 indexed citations
2.
Searchinger, Tim, et al.. (2019). Creating a sustainable food future: A menu of solutions to feed nearly 10 billion people by 2050. Final report. Agritrop (Cirad).73 indexed citations
3.
Searchinger, Tim, et al.. (2019). Creating a Sustainable Food Future.15 indexed citations
4.
Hanson, Craig, Katie L. Flanagan, H.E.J. Bos-Brouwers, et al.. (2019). Reducing Food Loss and Waste: Ten Interventions to Scale Impact.5 indexed citations
5.
Ranganathan, Janet, Richard Waite, Tim Searchinger, & Craig Hanson. (2018). How to Sustainably Feed 10 Billion People by 2050, in 21 Charts.46 indexed citations
6.
Hanson, Craig & Janet Ranganathan. (2017). INSIDER: Why Burning Trees for Energy Harms the Climate.1 indexed citations
7.
Steer, Andrew C. & Craig Hanson. (2015). Biofuels Are Not a Green Alternative to Fossil Fuels.4 indexed citations
8.
Hanson, Craig, et al.. (2015). Win-win: Reducing Water Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in China’s Power Sector.2 indexed citations
Hanson, Craig, Brian Lipinski, Johannes Friedrich, & Clementine O’Connor. (2015). What’s Food Loss and Waste Got to Do with Climate Change? A Lot, Actually..5 indexed citations
11.
Searchinger, Tim, Craig Hanson, & Jean-Marc Lacape. (2014). Crop Breeding: Renewing the Global Commitment.1 indexed citations
12.
Reytar, Katie, Craig Hanson, & Norbert Henninger. (2014). Indicators of Sustainable Agriculture: A Scoping Analysis.15 indexed citations
13.
Lipinski, Brian, et al.. (2013). Reducing Food Loss and Waste.229 indexed citations
14.
Searchinger, Tim, Craig Hanson, Janet Ranganathan, et al.. (2013). Creating a Sustainable Food Future: Interim Findings.27 indexed citations
15.
Searchinger, Tim, Craig Hanson, Janet Ranganathan, et al.. (2013). The Great Balancing Act.3 indexed citations
Hanson, Craig, et al.. (2006). Taxing Carbon to Finance Tax Reform.2 indexed citations
20.
Hanson, Craig, et al.. (1997). Deep Ecology And The Antarctic Marine Living Resources: Lessons For Other Regimes. 3(1). 5.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.