Craig Haifer
- Molecular Biology
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Genetics
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rupert W. LeongSudarshan ParamsothyThomas J. BorodyNadeem O. KaakoushLaurence Don Wai LuuSimon GhalyTao YangSiddharth Sood
- Topics
- Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (10 papers)Gut microbiota and health (9 papers)Inflammatory Bowel Disease (7 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGastroenterology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Craig Haifer
20 papers receiving 400 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Molecular Biology 232
- Infectious Diseases 216
- Epidemiology 154
- Genetics 97
- Gastroenterology 76
Countries citing papers authored by Craig Haifer
This map shows the geographic impact of Craig Haifer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig Haifer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig Haifer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Craig Haifer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig Haifer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig Haifer. The network helps show where Craig Haifer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig Haifer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig Haifer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig Haifer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig Haifer. Craig Haifer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | Lyophilised oral faecal microbiota transplantation for ulcerative colitis (LOTUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialbreakdown → | 200 |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | Switching Australian patients with moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease from originator infliximab to biosimilar Inflectra: Interim results from a multicenter parallel cohort study | 2 |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Craig Haifer
Craig Haifer is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (10 papers), Gut microbiota and health (9 papers) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (76 citations), Infectious Diseases (216 citations) and Transplantation (15 citations). Craig Haifer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Rupert W. Leong, Sudarshan Paramsothy, Thomas J. Borody, Nadeem O. Kaakoush, Laurence Don Wai Luu, Simon Ghaly, Tao Yang, Siddharth Sood, Peter Angus and Adam Testro. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.