Cormack C. Gates

1.8k total citations
9 papers, 191 citations indexed

About

Cormack C. Gates is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Cormack C. Gates has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 191 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Ecology, 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Cormack C. Gates's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers). Cormack C. Gates is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers). Cormack C. Gates collaborates with scholars based in Canada, South Africa and United States. Cormack C. Gates's co-authors include Nicholas C. Larter, François Messier, Petr E. Komers, John A. Virgl, Darren J. Bender, Chris H. Hugenholtz, T. A. Fox, Sheelagh Carpendale, Jan Adamczewski and Mark Lindquist and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Technological Forecasting and Social Change and Biodiversity and Conservation.

In The Last Decade

Cormack C. Gates

8 papers receiving 168 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Cormack C. Gates Canada	6	151	41	36	30	21	9	191
Laurence H. Watson South Africa	9	195 1.3×	68 1.7×	43 1.2×	16 0.5×	32 1.5×	20	251
Taras Sipko Russia	8	155 1.0×	31 0.8×	59 1.6×	11 0.4×	20 1.0×	21	220
Jeffrey A. Keay United States	6	326 2.2×	69 1.7×	38 1.1×	51 1.7×	45 2.1×	7	369
Fernando M. Contreras‐Moreno Mexico	8	169 1.1×	15 0.4×	23 0.6×	27 0.9×	15 0.7×	47	197
Neil F. Payne United States	11	224 1.5×	34 0.8×	23 0.6×	11 0.4×	11 0.5×	25	260
Valério A. Macandza South Africa	9	249 1.6×	98 2.4×	48 1.3×	35 1.2×	42 2.0×	13	295
Lynn R. Irby United States	11	268 1.8×	80 2.0×	48 1.3×	13 0.4×	42 2.0×	31	323
Peter Smolko Slovakia	10	146 1.0×	35 0.9×	38 1.1×	29 1.0×	28 1.3×	18	201
John A. Virgl Canada	12	302 2.0×	114 2.8×	49 1.4×	35 1.2×	29 1.4×	21	354
Mikkel Stelvig Denmark	11	213 1.4×	26 0.6×	48 1.3×	74 2.5×	17 0.8×	20	318

Countries citing papers authored by Cormack C. Gates

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cormack C. Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cormack C. Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cormack C. Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cormack C. Gates

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cormack C. Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cormack C. Gates. The network helps show where Cormack C. Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cormack C. Gates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cormack C. Gates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cormack C. Gates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cormack C. Gates. Cormack C. Gates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Levy, Richard, et al.. (2017). Evaluation of a visual analytics decision support tool for wind farm placement planning in Alberta: Findings from a focus group study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 117. 70–83. 7 indexed citations

Jones, Paul F., et al.. (2015). Variability in the Selection Patterns of Pronghorn: Are they Really Native Prairie Obligates?. Insecta mundi. 4 indexed citations

Fox, T. A., Chris H. Hugenholtz, Darren J. Bender, & Cormack C. Gates. (2012). Can bison play a role in conserving habitat for endangered sandhills species in Canada?. Biodiversity and Conservation. 21(6). 1441–1455. 15 indexed citations

Komers, Petr E., François Messier, & Cormack C. Gates. (1993). Group structure in wood bison: nutritional and reproductive determinants. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 71(7). 1367–1371. 46 indexed citations

Larter, Nicholas C. & Cormack C. Gates. (1991). Diet and habitat selection of wood bison in relation to seasonal changes in forage quantity and quality. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 69(10). 2677–2685. 86 indexed citations

Larter, Nicholas C., et al.. (1989). Bisoniana 102. The influence of rut and environmental factors on the behaviour of wood bison. ACTA THERIOLOGICA. 34. 179–193. 17 indexed citations

Larter, Nicholas C., et al.. (1989). The influence of rut and environmental factors on the behaviour of wood bison. 34. 12 indexed citations

Gates, Cormack C., Jan Adamczewski, & Robert Mulders. (1986). Comparison of body composition and growth .potential in two related island populations of caribou. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(2). 359–359. 3 indexed citations

Adamczewski, Jan, Cormack C. Gates, & Robert J. Hudson. (1986). Index measurements of carcass composition for Coats Island caribou. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(2). 353–353. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact