Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation
1991998 citationsJafna L. Cox, Richard B. Schuessler et al.Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Constance Stone
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Constance Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Constance Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constance Stone more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Constance Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Constance Stone. The network helps show where Constance Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Constance Stone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Constance Stone.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Constance Stone based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Constance Stone. Constance Stone is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Papas, Athena, Gianluca Martuscelli, Mabi Singh, et al.. (2002). A study to assess the safety and tolerability of three toothbrushes.. PubMed. 13(5). 203–6.5 indexed citations
Cox, James L., Thomas E. Canavan, Richard B. Schuessler, et al.. (1991). The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 101(3). 406–426.369 indexed citations
8.
Cox, Jafna L., Richard B. Schuessler, Harry J. D’Agostino, et al.. (1991). The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 101(4). 569–583.998 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Cox, James L., Thomas E. Canavan, Richard B. Schuessler, et al.. (1991). The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. II. Intraoperative electrophysiologic mapping and description of the electrophysiologic basis of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation.. PubMed. 101(3). 406–26.494 indexed citations
Tweddell, James S., et al.. (1989). Focal cryoablation guided solely by intraoperative potential mapping ablates ventricular tachycardia of endocardial origin. 40. 216–218.1 indexed citations
12.
Stone, Constance, Byung‐Chul Chang, James S. Tweddell, et al.. (1989). Ablation of atrial fibrillation by the maze procedure. 40. 213–215.12 indexed citations
13.
Tweddell, James S., A. N. E. Zimmerman, Constance Stone, et al.. (1989). Pericardiocentesis guided by a pulse generator. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 14(4). 1074–1083.5 indexed citations
14.
Tweddell, James S., Atsushi Harada, Constance Stone, et al.. (1988). Computerized potential distribution mapping for rapid localization of ventricular tachycardia of septal origin. 39. 257–259.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.