Connie Van

1.0k citations
49 papers · 687 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Connie Van

44 papers receiving 675 citations

Peers

Connie Van
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 58
  • Toxicology 51
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 36
  • Pharmacology 62
  • General Health Professions 106
Replace Katherine R. Zigmont with:
Katherine R. Zigmont United States
Mary L Grady United States
Catherine L. Annas United States
Kristine M. Gleason United States
Joann L. Baril United States
Alison L. Cracknell United Kingdom
Nidhi Shah United States
Cara Joyce Cabilan Australia
Fernando Martínez Martínez Spain
Ewa Dudzik-Urbaniak Norway
Connie Van relative to Katherine R. Zigmont United States Katherine R. Zigmont's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.9×
Katherine R. Zigmont · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Connie Van

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Connie Van's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Connie Van with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Connie Van more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Connie Van

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Connie Van. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Connie Van. The network helps show where Connie Van may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Connie Van, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Connie Van Line = papers co-authored together Connie Van links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201666
2 201556
3 201150
4 201247
5 201935
6 202131
7 201930
8 201327
9 201724
10 201923
11 201522
12 200721
13 201620
14 201920
15 202219
16 201218
17 201217
18 202117
19 202215
20 202013

About Connie Van

Connie Van is a scholar working on Nephrology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Toxicology and General Health Professions, having authored 49 papers that have together received 687 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (6 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (4 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (4 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (58 citations), Toxicology (51 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (36 citations), Pharmacology (62 citations) and General Health Professions (106 citations). Connie Van has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Kate Anne Curtis, Ines Krass, Kim Foster, Rebecca J Mitchell, Bernadette Mitchell, Alexandra Young, Daniel S J Costa, Ronald Lynel Castelino, Penelope Abbott and Syed Tabish R. Zaidi. Their work appears in journals such as Injury, Journal of Nephrology, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Peritoneal Dialysis International and Expert Opinion on Drug Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact