Concetta Federico
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Salvatore SacconeGiorgio BernardiVelia D’AgataAgata Grazia D’AmicoGrazia MaugeriSebastiano CavallaroDaniela Maria RasàClaudio Bucolo
- Topics
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (15 papers)Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (14 papers)Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (14 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistrySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Concetta Federico
109 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Molecular Biology 1.0k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 335
- Genetics 315
- Plant Science 258
- Ophthalmology 165
Countries citing papers authored by Concetta Federico
This map shows the geographic impact of Concetta Federico's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Concetta Federico with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Concetta Federico more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Concetta Federico
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Concetta Federico. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Concetta Federico. The network helps show where Concetta Federico may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Concetta Federico
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Concetta Federico. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Concetta Federico based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Concetta Federico. Concetta Federico is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About Concetta Federico
Concetta Federico is a scholar working on Physiology, Ophthalmology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 110 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (15 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (14 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (335 citations), Ophthalmology (165 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.0k citations). Concetta Federico has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Salvatore Saccone, Giorgio Bernardi, Velia D’Agata, Agata Grazia D’Amico, Grazia Maugeri, Sebastiano Cavallaro, Daniela Maria Rasà, Claudio Bucolo, Sabrina Tosi and Francesca Bruno. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.