C.M. O’Meara

663 total citations
21 papers, 491 citations indexed

About

C.M. O’Meara is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Agronomy and Crop Science and Reproductive Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, C.M. O’Meara has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 491 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 15 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 14 papers in Reproductive Medicine. Recurrent topics in C.M. O’Meara's work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (17 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (14 papers) and Sperm and Testicular Function (13 papers). C.M. O’Meara is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Biology and Fertility (17 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (14 papers) and Sperm and Testicular Function (13 papers). C.M. O’Meara collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United States and Spain. C.M. O’Meara's co-authors include P. Lonergan, Seán Fair, A.C.O. Evans, A. Donovan, D. Rizos, A. K. Kelly, Michael G. Wade, John P. Hanrahan, Patrick E. Duffy and M.P. Boland and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Dairy Science and Journal of Animal Science.

In The Last Decade

C.M. O’Meara

21 papers receiving 470 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C.M. O’Meara Ireland 14 323 304 215 136 57 21 491
S.D. Kharche India 12 284 0.9× 277 0.9× 119 0.6× 150 1.1× 69 1.2× 100 479
Letícia Zoccolaro Oliveira Brazil 13 286 0.9× 305 1.0× 133 0.6× 149 1.1× 59 1.0× 51 464
Mehmet Bozkurt Ataman Türkiye 14 222 0.7× 270 0.9× 223 1.0× 138 1.0× 37 0.6× 59 590
C.C. Love United States 13 401 1.2× 424 1.4× 197 0.9× 100 0.7× 73 1.3× 35 612
G.D.A. Gastal United States 13 271 0.8× 206 0.7× 197 0.9× 89 0.7× 34 0.6× 40 381
KM Morton Australia 13 416 1.3× 414 1.4× 176 0.8× 200 1.5× 57 1.0× 24 592
Jorgea Pradieé Brazil 12 280 0.9× 274 0.9× 136 0.6× 54 0.4× 39 0.7× 36 441
Mustafa Hitit Türkiye 11 256 0.8× 324 1.1× 147 0.7× 105 0.8× 72 1.3× 48 520
A.T. Palasz Canada 16 378 1.2× 363 1.2× 139 0.6× 170 1.3× 82 1.4× 36 532
S.R. Teague United States 15 461 1.4× 564 1.9× 137 0.6× 119 0.9× 104 1.8× 39 739

Countries citing papers authored by C.M. O’Meara

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.M. O’Meara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.M. O’Meara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.M. O’Meara more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.M. O’Meara

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.M. O’Meara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.M. O’Meara. The network helps show where C.M. O’Meara may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.M. O’Meara

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.M. O’Meara. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.M. O’Meara based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.M. O’Meara. C.M. O’Meara is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kos, Daphne, et al.. (2023). Occupational therapy in multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2023(5). 2 indexed citations
2.
Rabaglino, María Belén, Chrystelle Le Danvic, Laurent Schibler, et al.. (2022). Identification of sperm proteins as biomarkers of field fertility in Holstein-Friesian bulls used for artificial insemination. Journal of Dairy Science. 105(12). 10033–10046. 5 indexed citations
3.
O’Meara, C.M., et al.. (2022). Increasing the frequency of ejaculate collection in young dairy bulls increases semen production and field fertility. Theriogenology. 182. 45–52. 6 indexed citations
4.
O’Meara, C.M., et al.. (2022). The effect of adjusting settings within a Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) system on bovine sperm motility and morphology results. Animal Reproduction. 19(1). e20210077–e20210077. 27 indexed citations
5.
6.
Murphy, Elizabeth, et al.. (2018). Comparison of plant- and egg yolk-based semen diluents on in vitro sperm kinematics and in vivo fertility of frozen-thawed bull semen. Animal Reproduction Science. 191. 70–75. 26 indexed citations
7.
Keaver, Laura, et al.. (2018). Providing Nutrition Care to Patients with Chronic Disease: An Irish Teaching Hospital Healthcare Professional Study. Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University). 2018. 1–7. 15 indexed citations
10.
Murphy, Craig P., et al.. (2016). A comparison of semen diluents on the in vitro and in vivo fertility of liquid bull semen. Journal of Dairy Science. 100(2). 1541–1554. 27 indexed citations
11.
O’Meara, C.M., et al.. (2011). Gene silencing in bovine zygotes: siRNA transfection versus microinjection. Reproduction Fertility and Development. 23(4). 534–543. 15 indexed citations
12.
O’Meara, C.M., et al.. (2009). 131 GENE SILENCING IN BOVINE ZYGOTES: SIRNA TRANSFECTION v. MICROINJECTION. Reproduction Fertility and Development. 22(1). 224–224. 1 indexed citations
13.
O’Meara, C.M., A. Donovan, John P. Hanrahan, et al.. (2007). Resuspending ram spermatozoa in seminal plasma after cryopreservation does not improve pregnancy rate in cervically inseminated ewes. Theriogenology. 67(7). 1262–1268. 35 indexed citations
14.
Fair, Seán, J. P. Hanrahan, A. Donovan, et al.. (2006). Hormonal relationships during the periovulatory period among ewe breeds known to differ in fertility after cervical artificial insemination with frozen thawed semen. Animal Reproduction Science. 97(3-4). 284–294. 16 indexed citations
15.
García-García, R.M., F. Ward, Seán Fair, et al.. (2006). Development and quality of sheep embryos cultured in commercial G1.3/G2.3 sequential media. Animal Reproduction Science. 98(3-4). 233–240. 21 indexed citations
16.
Fair, Seán, J. P. Hanrahan, F. Ward, et al.. (2005). The difference in embryo quality between Belclare and Suffolk ewes is not due to differences in oocyte quality. Theriogenology. 66(2). 191–197. 8 indexed citations
17.
O’Meara, C.M., John P. Hanrahan, A. Donovan, et al.. (2005). Relationship between in vitro fertilisation of ewe oocytes and the fertility of ewes following cervical artificial insemination with frozen-thawed ram semen. Theriogenology. 64(8). 1797–1808. 41 indexed citations
18.
Fair, Seán, J. P. Hanrahan, C.M. O’Meara, et al.. (2004). Differences between Belclare and Suffolk ewes in fertilization rate, embryo quality and accessory sperm number after cervical or laparoscopic artificial insemination. Theriogenology. 63(7). 1995–2005. 61 indexed citations
19.
Hawken, P.A.R., A.P. Beard, C.M. O’Meara, et al.. (2004). The effects of ram exposure during progestagen oestrus synchronisation and time of ram introduction post progestagen withdrawal on fertility in ewes. Theriogenology. 63(3). 860–871. 12 indexed citations
20.
Rizos, D., Alfonso Gutiérrez‐Adán, Pedro Moreira, et al.. (2004). Species‐related differences in blastocyst quality are associated with differences in relative mRNA transcription. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 69(4). 381–386. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026