Clodovis Boff
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Education
- Philosophy top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Leonardo BoffRobert R. BarrPhillip Berryman
- Topics
- Religion and Society in Latin America (16 papers)Religious and Theological Studies (10 papers)Christian Theology and Mission (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaMedical Entomology and ZoologyCerf eBooks
- Partner nations
- BrazilPuerto RicoUnited States
In The Last Decade
Clodovis Boff
18 papers receiving 160 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Sociology and Political Science 154
- Religious studies 73
- Education 37
- Philosophy 29
- Political Science and International Relations 27
Countries citing papers authored by Clodovis Boff
This map shows the geographic impact of Clodovis Boff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clodovis Boff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clodovis Boff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clodovis Boff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clodovis Boff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clodovis Boff. The network helps show where Clodovis Boff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clodovis Boff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clodovis Boff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clodovis Boff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clodovis Boff. Clodovis Boff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Por una mariología social | 0 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Teoria do método teológico | 3 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | The Bible, the church, and the poor | 10 |
| 11 | Qu'est-ce que la théologie de la libération? | 0 |
| 12 | Wie treibt man Theologie der Befreiung | 0 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Liberation theology : from dialogue to confrontation | 9 |
| 15 | Teologia da libertação no debate atual | 0 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Clodovis Boff
Clodovis Boff is a scholar working on Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science and General Social Sciences, having authored 32 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society in Latin America (16 papers), Religious and Theological Studies (10 papers) and Christian Theology and Mission (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (73 citations), Sociology and Political Science (154 citations) and Philosophy (29 citations). Clodovis Boff has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Puerto Rico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Leonardo Boff, Robert R. Barr and Phillip Berryman. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Cerf eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.