Clive Kay
- Oncology top 10%
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 6
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 6
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments 4
-
- Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas 4
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders 4
- Surgery top 10%
- Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments 6
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 6
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment 4
- Gastroenterology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Daniel KüllingAndrew LoweSam E. StephensonPeter B. CottonDion MortonSteve HalliganJeremy W. R. YoungJulian Teare
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Clive Kay
30 papers receiving 751 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Oncology 436
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 461
- Surgery 469
- Gastroenterology 37
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 149
Countries citing papers authored by Clive Kay
This map shows the geographic impact of Clive Kay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clive Kay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clive Kay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clive Kay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clive Kay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clive Kay. The network helps show where Clive Kay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clive Kay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 114 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 158 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 85 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 78 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 37 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 13 | Is MRCP worthwhile when ERCP is planned?: A prospective trial in a referral center | 1998 | 2 |
| 14 | 1998 | 23 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 27 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 24 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 19 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 46 |
About Clive Kay
Clive Kay is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pharmacy, having authored 30 papers that have together received 783 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (6 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (4 papers), Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas (4 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (436 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (461 citations), Surgery (469 citations), Gastroenterology (37 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (149 citations). Clive Kay has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Külling, Andrew Lowe, Sam E. Stephenson, Peter B. Cotton, Dion Morton, Steve Halligan, Jeremy W. R. Young, Julian Teare, Kate Wooldrage and Rob Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as Endoscopy, Clinical Radiology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Lancet and British Journal of Haematology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.