Clinton N. Woolsey
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Co-authors
- Harry F. HarlowTheodore C. EricksonW. E. GilsonDonald R. MeyerVicente M. MonteroR. W. GuilleryJohn W. BarnardRichard A. Lende
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers)Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Clinton N. Woolsey
20 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 675
- Neurology 453
- Social Psychology 246
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 234
Countries citing papers authored by Clinton N. Woolsey
This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton N. Woolsey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton N. Woolsey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton N. Woolsey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton N. Woolsey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton N. Woolsey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton N. Woolsey. The network helps show where Clinton N. Woolsey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clinton N. Woolsey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clinton N. Woolsey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clinton N. Woolsey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clinton N. Woolsey. Clinton N. Woolsey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Multiple auditory areas | 15 |
| 2 | 89 | |
| 3 | Multiple somatic areas | 36 |
| 4 | 156 | |
| 5 | Localization in somatic sensory and motor areas of human cerebral cortex as determined by direct recording of evoked potentials and electrical stimulationbreakdown → | 490 |
| 6 | 118 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 61 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | Some observations on brain fissuration in relation to cortical localization of function | 24 |
| 14 | Biological and biochemical bases of behaviorbreakdown → | 867 |
| 15 | 78 | |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | 72 | |
| 18 | 50 | |
| 19 | 90 | |
| 20 | 61 |
About Clinton N. Woolsey
Clinton N. Woolsey is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Neurology (453 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (675 citations). Clinton N. Woolsey has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Harry F. Harlow, Theodore C. Erickson, W. E. Gilson, Donald R. Meyer, Vicente M. Montero, R. W. Guillery, John W. Barnard, Richard A. Lende, G. Schaltenbrand and Raymond C. Miles. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Neurology and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.