Clinton J. Devin
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.1%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 0.5%
- Pain Management and Opioid Use
Papers in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 170
- Pharmacology 92
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 90
- Co-authors
- Matthew J. McGirtPaul ParkKristin R. ArcherDavid N. ShauAnthony L. AsherSilky ChotaiAhilan SivaganesanJoseph Cheng
- Journals
- The Spine Journal (72 papers)Neurosurgery (34 papers)Spine (32 papers)Journal of Neurosurgery Spine (18 papers)Neurosurgical FOCUS (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Clinton J. Devin
234 papers receiving 6.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 3.4k
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 649
- Pharmacology 1.9k
- Surgery 4.6k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Clinton J. Devin
This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton J. Devin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton J. Devin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton J. Devin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton J. Devin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton J. Devin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton J. Devin. The network helps show where Clinton J. Devin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clinton J. Devin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 88 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 55 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 133 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 77 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 69 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 62 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 134 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 56 |
About Clinton J. Devin
Clinton J. Devin is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 241 papers that have together received 6.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (170 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (90 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (53 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (44 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (43 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (26 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (22 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (3.4k citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (649 citations), Pharmacology (1.9k citations), Surgery (4.6k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.1k citations). Clinton J. Devin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. McGirt, Paul Park, Kristin R. Archer, David N. Shau, Anthony L. Asher, Silky Chotai, Ahilan Sivaganesan, Joseph Cheng, Stephen K. Mendenhall and Owoicho Adogwa. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Neurosurgery, Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine and Neurosurgical FOCUS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.