Clinton C. Shock

2.6k total citations
112 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Clinton C. Shock is a scholar working on Plant Science, Soil Science and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Clinton C. Shock has authored 112 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 63 papers in Plant Science, 42 papers in Soil Science and 27 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Clinton C. Shock's work include Irrigation Practices and Water Management (35 papers), Potato Plant Research (21 papers) and Garlic and Onion Studies (17 papers). Clinton C. Shock is often cited by papers focused on Irrigation Practices and Water Management (35 papers), Potato Plant Research (21 papers) and Garlic and Onion Studies (17 papers). Clinton C. Shock collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Brazil. Clinton C. Shock's co-authors include Lamont D. Saunders, Erik B.G. Feibert, Eric P. Eldredge, Fengxin Wang, Fengxin Wang, David C. Nielsen, B. R. Gardner, Kaijing Yang, Shaozhong Kang and André Belmont Pereira and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Plant and Soil and Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

In The Last Decade

Clinton C. Shock

107 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Clinton C. Shock United States	25	1.2k	969	513	398	212	112	2.1k
Finn Plauborg Denmark	29	1.0k 0.8×	971 1.0×	401 0.8×	533 1.3×	252 1.2×	78	2.1k
Thieres George Freire da Silva Brazil	26	1.3k 1.1×	706 0.7×	771 1.5×	413 1.0×	168 0.8×	271	2.5k
T.K. Hartz United States	28	1.7k 1.4×	1.4k 1.5×	121 0.2×	161 0.4×	170 0.8×	97	2.6k
Luciana Sandra Bastos de Souza Brazil	20	703 0.6×	390 0.4×	350 0.7×	254 0.6×	106 0.5×	148	1.4k
Anna Maria Stellacci Italy	22	916 0.7×	678 0.7×	137 0.3×	201 0.5×	269 1.3×	77	1.8k
M. S. B. de Moura Brazil	22	654 0.5×	424 0.4×	215 0.4×	496 1.2×	135 0.6×	156	1.4k
Johannes Scholberg United States	28	1.4k 1.2×	1.4k 1.4×	73 0.1×	359 0.9×	170 0.8×	64	2.5k
Daniel Plénet France	16	1.3k 1.1×	698 0.7×	86 0.2×	370 0.9×	129 0.6×	36	2.2k
Rossella Albrizio Italy	22	1.3k 1.1×	571 0.6×	131 0.3×	595 1.5×	87 0.4×	43	1.8k
E.G. Barrett-Lennard Australia	33	2.2k 1.8×	509 0.5×	94 0.2×	348 0.9×	132 0.6×	119	3.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Clinton C. Shock

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton C. Shock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton C. Shock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton C. Shock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton C. Shock

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton C. Shock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton C. Shock. The network helps show where Clinton C. Shock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clinton C. Shock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clinton C. Shock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clinton C. Shock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clinton C. Shock. Clinton C. Shock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Zhao, Jianyu, et al.. (2024). Small soil wetted proportion and emitter flow rate of drip irrigation enhance potato yield by improving soil water and aeration in the sandy loam in arid Northwest China. Field Crops Research. 316. 109498–109498. 2 indexed citations

Banine, Fatima, Angela Hoffman, Basappa Basappa, et al.. (2024). Distinct chemical structures inhibit the CEMIP hyaluronidase and promote oligodendrocyte progenitor cell maturation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 300(12). 107916–107916. 1 indexed citations

Shock, Clinton C., et al.. (2018). Irrigation Requirements for Seed Production of Three Leguminous Wildflowers of the U.S. Intermountain West. HortScience. 53(5). 692–697. 3 indexed citations

Shock, Clinton C., et al.. (2017). Irrigation Requirements for Seed Production of Two Eriogonum Species in a Semiarid Environment. HortScience. 52(9). 1188–1194. 2 indexed citations

Shock, Clinton C., et al.. (2017). Soil Water Tension Irrigation Criteria Affects Stevia rebaudiana Leaf Yield and Leaf Steviol Glycoside Composition. HortScience. 52(1). 154–161. 7 indexed citations

Shock, Clinton C., et al.. (2016). Irrigation Requirements for Seed Production of Five Lomatium Species in a Semiarid Environment. HortScience. 51(10). 1270–1277. 1 indexed citations

Shock, Clinton C., et al.. (2015). Response of Onion Yield, Grade, and Financial Return to Plant Population and Irrigation System. HortScience. 50(9). 1312–1318. 6 indexed citations

Félix, Joël, et al.. (2015). Irrigation Criteria and Sweetpotato Cultivar Performance in the Treasure Valley of Eastern Oregon. HortScience. 50(7). 1011–1017. 2 indexed citations

Shock, Clinton C., et al.. (2012). Research, Extension, and Good Farming Practices Improve Water Quality and Productivity. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 11(1). 14–30. 6 indexed citations

10.

Shock, Myrtle P., et al.. (2012). Cultivation and Irrigation of Fernleaf Biscuitroot (Lomatium dissectum) for Seed Production. HortScience. 47(10). 1525–1528. 3 indexed citations

11.

Shock, Clinton C., Erik B.G. Feibert, & Lamont D. Saunders. (2004). Plant Population and Nitrogen Fertilization for Subsurface Drip-irrigated Onion. HortScience. 39(7). 1722–1727. 41 indexed citations

12.

Shock, Clinton C., et al.. (2003). Alternative methods for controlling onion thrips.. 895–900. 2 indexed citations

13.

Feibert, Erik B.G., Clinton C. Shock, & Lamont D. Saunders. (2003). Nonconventional Additives Leave Onion Yield and Quality Unchanged. HortScience. 38(3). 381–386. 12 indexed citations

14.

Sullivan, Dan M., et al.. (2001). Nutrient management for onions in the Pacific Northwest. Better crops with plant food. 25 indexed citations

15.

Hoffman, Angela, Clinton C. Shock, & Erik B.G. Feibert. (1999). Taxane and ABA Production in Yew under Different Soil Water Regimes. HortScience. 34(5). 882–885. 10 indexed citations

16.

Shock, Clinton C., Erik B.G. Feibert, & Lamont D. Saunders. (1998). Onion Yield and Quality Affected by Soil Water Potential as Irrigation Threshold. HortScience. 33(7). 1188–1191. 79 indexed citations

17.

Thro, Ann Marie & Clinton C. Shock. (1987). Performance of subtropical forage legumes in Louisiana, south-central USA.. Tropical Agriculture. 64(4). 297–304. 2 indexed citations

18.

George, Ramlah & Clinton C. Shock. (1984). Adaptability of tropical forages to California's Central Valley. California Agriculture. 38(9). 10–12.

19.

Shock, Clinton C.. (1982). Rebaudi's stevia: Natural noncaloric sweeteners. California Agriculture. 36(9). 4–5. 18 indexed citations

20.

Shock, Clinton C. & William A. Williams. (1977). As pastagens e seu manejo no Centro-Sul do Brasil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 12(1). 105–118. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact