Clement Lam

56 papers receiving 738 citations

Peers

Clement Lam
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 287
  • Artificial Intelligence 459
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 227
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 585
  • Geometry and Topology 87
Replace Fred Piper with:
Fred Piper United Kingdom
Aiden A. Bruen Canada
Ian M. Wanless Australia
Andrew Klapper United States
Hadi Kharaghani Canada
Gyula O. H. Katona Hungary
L. H. Harper United States
George Havas Australia
Ákos Seress United States
J. Spencer United States
Clement Lam relative to Fred Piper United Kingdom Fred Piper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Fred Piper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clement Lam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clement Lam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clement Lam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clement Lam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clement Lam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clement Lam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clement Lam. The network helps show where Clement Lam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clement Lam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Clement Lam Line = papers co-authored together Clement Lam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198995
2 198442
3 199139
4 198328
5 199628
6 200326
7 198925
8 199124
9 200323
10 200022
11 199022
12 197521
13 201020
14 199020
15 199919
16 198519
17 200519
18 197519
19 200519
20 197718

About Clement Lam

Clement Lam is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 56 papers that have together received 821 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include graph theory and CDMA systems (43 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (29 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (15 papers), Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems (7 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (5 papers), Mathematics and Applications (4 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers) and Advanced Graph Theory Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (287 citations), Artificial Intelligence (459 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (227 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (585 citations) and Geometry and Topology (87 citations). Clement Lam has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include L. Thiel, Vladimir D. Tonchev, G. Ge, A. Blokhuis, Gennian Ge, Ying Miao, Jennifer Seberry, Sheridan Houghten, Alan C. H. Ling and H.F. Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, Discrete Mathematics, Journal of Combinatorial Designs, Designs Codes and Cryptography and Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact