Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud

3.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
97 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud has authored 97 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 65 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 20 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud's work include Memory Processes and Influences (27 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (27 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (24 papers). Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (27 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (27 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (24 papers). Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud collaborates with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud's co-authors include Vincenzo Cestari, Pietro Spataro, Martine Ammassari‐Teule, Liliana Minichiello, David P Wolfer, Hans‐Peter Lipp, Rüdiger Klein, Ralf Kühn, Tobias Bonhoeffer and Martin Körte and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Neuron.

In The Last Decade

Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud

95 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

Essential Role for TrkB Receptors in Hippocampus-Mediated... 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 200 400 600

Peers

Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud
Hasker P. Davis United States
Robert J. Samuelson United States
John Power Australia
Edward J. Green United States
Ekrem Dere Germany
Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud
Citations per year, relative to Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud (= 1×) peers Melanie J. Sekeres

Countries citing papers authored by Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud. The network helps show where Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud. Clelia Rossi‐Arnaud is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Marco, Niccolò Di, et al.. (2025). The simulation of judgment in LLMs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 122(42). e2518443122–e2518443122. 1 indexed citations
2.
Spataro, Pietro, et al.. (2023). The binding of negative emotional stimuli with spatial information in working memory: A possible role for the episodic buffer. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 17. 1112805–1112805. 2 indexed citations
3.
Ricci, Eleonora, Marco Colasanti, Merylin Monaro, et al.. (2023). How to Distinguish Feigned from Genuine Depressive Symptoms: Response Patterns and Content Analysis of the SIMS Affective Disorder Scale. Psychological Injury and Law. 16(3). 237–248.
4.
Rossi‐Arnaud, Clelia, et al.. (2023). Positive and negative effects of collaboration on suggestibility and false memory in online groups. Current Psychology. 43(6). 5703–5715. 6 indexed citations
5.
Spataro, Pietro, et al.. (2022). Predictors of the Intention to Be Vaccinated against COVID-19 in a Sample of Italian Respondents at the Start of the Immunization Campaign. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 12(1). 111–111. 14 indexed citations
6.
Costanzi, Marco, et al.. (2021). Forgetting Unwanted Memories: Active Forgetting and Implications for the Development of Psychological Disorders. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 11(4). 241–241. 20 indexed citations
7.
Spataro, Pietro, et al.. (2021). The attentional boost effect enhances the item-specific, but not the relational, encoding of verbal material: Evidence from multiple recall tests with related and unrelated lists.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 48(8). 1083–1097. 9 indexed citations
8.
Rossi‐Arnaud, Clelia, Pietro Spataro, Fabrizio Doricchi, et al.. (2021). The Attentional Boost Effect in Young and Adult Euthymic Bipolar Patients and Healthy Controls. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 11(3). 185–185. 4 indexed citations
9.
Spataro, Pietro, et al.. (2019). Movements and Visuospatial Working Memory: Examining the Role of Movement and Attention to Movement.. Cognitive Science. 3411. 1 indexed citations
10.
Pellegrino, Michele, Mário Pinto, Stefano Lasaponara, et al.. (2019). The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space–number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants). Experimental Brain Research. 237(10). 2633–2643. 15 indexed citations
11.
Costanzi, Marco, Daniele Saraulli, Stefano Lasaponara, et al.. (2019). The Effect of Emotional Valence and Arousal on Visuo-Spatial Working Memory: Incidental Emotional Learning and Memory for Object-Location. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 2587–2587. 32 indexed citations
12.
Spataro, Pietro, Daniele Saraulli, Neil W. Mulligan, et al.. (2017). Not all identification tasks are born equal: testing the involvement of production processes in perceptual identification and lexical decision. Psychological Research. 82(4). 685–699. 5 indexed citations
13.
Rossi‐Arnaud, Clelia, et al.. (2015). Collaboration in implicit memory: evidence from word-fragment completion and category exemplar generation. Psychological Research. 81(1). 55–65. 3 indexed citations
14.
Rossi‐Arnaud, Clelia, Pietro Spataro, Daniele Saraulli, et al.. (2014). The attentional boost effect in schizophrenia.. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 123(3). 588–597. 5 indexed citations
15.
Cestari, Vincenzo, et al.. (2013). Memory for symmetry and perceptual binding in patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychologica. 144(3). 594–603. 4 indexed citations
16.
Rossi‐Arnaud, Clelia, Pietro Spataro, & Emiddia Longobardi. (2011). Effects of pointing on the recall of simultaneous and sequential visuospatial arrays: a role for retrieval strategies?. Psychological Research. 76(6). 699–712. 8 indexed citations
17.
Costanzi, Marco, et al.. (2011). Extinction after retrieval: Effects on the associative and nonassociative components of remote contextual fear memory. Learning & Memory. 18(8). 508–518. 87 indexed citations
18.
Cestari, Vincenzo, et al.. (2007). Memory for object location: A span study in children.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 61(1). 13–20. 11 indexed citations
19.
Cestari, Vincenzo, et al.. (2005). Memory for Object Location: A Span Study in Children. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27). 1 indexed citations
20.
Ammassari‐Teule, Martine, et al.. (1992). Genotype-dependent involvement of limbic areas in spatial learning and postlesion recovery. Physiology & Behavior. 52(3). 505–510. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026