Claus‐Peter Richter

849 total citations
34 papers, 633 citations indexed

About

Claus‐Peter Richter is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Claus‐Peter Richter has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 633 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Sensory Systems, 14 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Claus‐Peter Richter's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (13 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (13 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (10 papers). Claus‐Peter Richter is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (13 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (13 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (10 papers). Claus‐Peter Richter collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Claus‐Peter Richter's co-authors include Joseph T. Walsh, E. Jansen, James D. Wells, Agnella Izzo Matic, Andrej Kral, Ingo U. Teudt, H. Maier, Agnella D. Izzo, Mark Bendett and Philip D. Littlefield and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Claus‐Peter Richter

31 papers receiving 625 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Claus‐Peter Richter United States 13 407 252 183 103 100 34 633
Agnella D. Izzo United States 10 599 1.5× 280 1.1× 135 0.7× 182 1.8× 110 1.1× 16 752
Xiaodong Tan United States 14 238 0.6× 194 0.8× 200 1.1× 40 0.4× 52 0.5× 35 496
Karina Needham Australia 18 322 0.8× 313 1.2× 334 1.8× 39 0.4× 116 1.2× 35 763
Agnella Izzo Matic United States 10 431 1.1× 201 0.8× 96 0.5× 92 0.9× 45 0.5× 15 485
Mark Bendett United States 7 322 0.8× 139 0.6× 67 0.4× 86 0.8× 61 0.6× 11 398
Marcus Jeschke Germany 14 479 1.2× 455 1.8× 182 1.0× 17 0.2× 88 0.9× 23 767
G. Reuter Germany 12 136 0.3× 223 0.9× 191 1.0× 29 0.3× 83 0.8× 34 428
Daniel Keppeler Germany 11 336 0.8× 218 0.9× 89 0.5× 18 0.2× 121 1.2× 16 537
Alexander Dieter Germany 9 331 0.8× 191 0.8× 69 0.4× 16 0.2× 66 0.7× 15 426
Stephanie B. Epp Australia 7 271 0.7× 254 1.0× 358 2.0× 17 0.2× 52 0.5× 13 545

Countries citing papers authored by Claus‐Peter Richter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claus‐Peter Richter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claus‐Peter Richter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claus‐Peter Richter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claus‐Peter Richter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claus‐Peter Richter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claus‐Peter Richter. The network helps show where Claus‐Peter Richter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claus‐Peter Richter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claus‐Peter Richter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claus‐Peter Richter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claus‐Peter Richter. Claus‐Peter Richter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zhang, Hongji, et al.. (2025). Kölliker's Organ Functions as a Developmental Hub in Mouse Cochlea Regulating Spiral Limbus and Tectorial Membrane Development. Journal of Neuroscience. 45(13). e0721242025–e0721242025.
2.
Shaheen, Aliah F., et al.. (2025). Hearing function and ossicular deformities and fractures in the oim mouse model of brittle bone disease. Hearing Research. 465. 109351–109351.
3.
Batey, Darren, Shashidhara Marathe, Kudakwashe Jakata, et al.. (2024). Hierarchical and operando tomography with x-rays and beyond. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 81–81.
4.
Cardoso, Luís, et al.. (2022). Treatments for hearing loss in osteogenesis imperfecta: a systematic review and meta-analysis on their efficacy. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 17125–17125. 8 indexed citations
5.
Withnell, Robert H., et al.. (2022). Mammalian middle ear mechanics: A review. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 10. 983510–983510. 11 indexed citations
6.
Tan, Xiaodong, Yingjie Zhou, Michelle Lim, et al.. (2020). Systemic application of honokiol prevents cisplatin ototoxicity without compromising its antitumor effect.. PubMed. 10(12). 4416–4434. 17 indexed citations
7.
Mandelis, Andreas, Bernard Choi, Brian J. F. Wong, et al.. (2015). Photonic Therapeutics and Diagnostics XI. 9303. 4 indexed citations
8.
Trifonov, Anton, et al.. (2014). 52-mJ, kHz-Nd:YAG Laser with Diffraction Limited Output. 15. JW2A.84–JW2A.84. 2 indexed citations
9.
Richter, Claus‐Peter, et al.. (2013). Masking of infrared neural stimulation (INS) in hearing and deaf guinea pigs. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8565. 85655V–85655V. 6 indexed citations
10.
Shapiro, Mikhail G., et al.. (2012). Infrared Light Excites Cells via Transient Changes in Membrane Electrical Capacitance. Biophysical Journal. 102(3). 719a–719a. 4 indexed citations
11.
Selvaraj, Senthil, Kevin Liu, Alan M. Robinson, et al.. (2012). In Vivo Determination of Mouse Olfactory Mucus Cation Concentrations in Normal and Inflammatory States. PLoS ONE. 7(7). e39600–e39600. 14 indexed citations
12.
Rajguru, Suhrud M., Richard D. Rabbitt, Agnella Izzo Matic, Stephen M. Highstein, & Claus‐Peter Richter. (2010). Selective Activation of Vestibular Hair Cells by Infrared Light. Biophysical Journal. 98(3). 507a–507a. 5 indexed citations
13.
Richter, Claus‐Peter, et al.. (2010). Neural stimulation with optical radiation. Laser & Photonics Review. 5(1). 68–80. 123 indexed citations
14.
Littlefield, Philip D., et al.. (2010). Laser stimulation of single auditory nerve fibers. The Laryngoscope. 120(10). 2071–2082. 37 indexed citations
15.
Richter, Claus‐Peter, Andrew J. Fishman, & Agnella D. Izzo. (2008). Cochlear Nerve Stimulation With Optical Radiation. Otolaryngology. 139(S2). 1 indexed citations
16.
Izzo, Agnella D., et al.. (2008). Laser stimulation of the auditory system at 1.94 μm and microsecond pulse durations. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6854. 68540C–68540C. 6 indexed citations
17.
Izzo, Agnella D., et al.. (2007). Optical Parameter Variability in Laser Nerve Stimulation: A Study of Pulse Duration, Repetition Rate, and Wavelength. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 54(6). 1108–1114. 113 indexed citations
18.
Micco, Alan G. & Claus‐Peter Richter. (2006). Tissue resistivities determine the current flow in the cochlea. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery. 14(5). 352–355. 27 indexed citations
19.
Richter, Claus‐Peter, et al.. (2000). Development of the Gerbil Inner Ear Observed in the Hemicochlea. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 1(3). 195–210. 28 indexed citations
20.
Richter, Claus‐Peter, et al.. (1996). Development of activity patterns in auditory nerve fibres of pigeons. Hearing Research. 95(1-2). 77–86. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026